Jacobs D M, Fink A S, Miller R P, Anderson W R, McVenes R D, Lessar J F, Cobian K E, Staffanson D B, Upton J E, Bubrick M P
Department of Surgery, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55415.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1993 Mar;16(3 Pt 1):434-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1993.tb01606.x.
In recent years, pacemaker lead failure due to compressive damage has been reported with increasing frequency. To document the mechanism of this failure, we evaluated explanted mechanically damaged leads with electrical testing, optical microscopy, and in some cases, scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In addition, we performed an autopsy study to measure the compressive loads on catheters placed percutaneously through the costoclavicular angle, as well as by cephalic cutdown. Of the 49 explanted compression damaged leads with enough clinical data for analysis, all had been placed by percutaneous subclavian puncture. Our autopsy data confirmed the significant increase in pressures generated in the costoclavicular angle for medial percutaneous subclavian catheterization (126 +/- 26 mmHg) compared to a more lateral percutaneous subclavian puncture (63 +/- 15 mmHg) or a cephalic cutdown (38 +/- 13 mmHg) (P < 0.01). In vivo coil compression testing documented loads up to 100 pounds per linear inch of coil and a compressive morphology by SEM identical to that seen in the clinical explants. Pacemaker leads appear to be susceptible to compression damage when placed by subclavian venipuncture. When possible, leads should be placed such that they avoid the tight costoclavicular angle.
近年来,因受压损伤导致的起搏器导线故障报告频率日益增加。为了记录这种故障的机制,我们通过电气测试、光学显微镜检查以及在某些情况下的扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查,对取出的机械损伤导线进行了评估。此外,我们进行了一项尸检研究,以测量经皮穿过肋锁角以及通过头静脉切开置入的导管上的压缩负荷。在49根有足够临床数据可供分析的取出的受压损伤导线上,所有导线均通过经皮锁骨下穿刺置入。我们的尸检数据证实,与更外侧的经皮锁骨下穿刺(63±15 mmHg)或头静脉切开(38±13 mmHg)相比,内侧经皮锁骨下导管置入时肋锁角处产生的压力显著增加(126±26 mmHg)(P<0.01)。体内线圈压缩测试记录了每线性英寸线圈高达100磅的负荷,并且SEM显示的压缩形态与临床取出物中所见相同。经锁骨下静脉穿刺置入起搏器导线时似乎易受压缩损伤。可能的话,应放置导线以避免其位于狭窄的肋锁角处。