Moe K E, Larsen L H, Prinz P N, Vitiello M V
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993 Apr;86(4):238-46. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(93)90104-4.
In a previous report, tonic REM sleep epochs from the all-night sleep EEG were processed and analyzed to produce a diagnostic that discriminated mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) from cognitively unimpaired control subjects. Here, we examine the specificity of this diagnostic in distinguishing depression from AD. Twenty-four cognitively unimpaired seniors (aged 63 +/- 1.3) with major depressive disorder (unipolar) were monitored for all-night EEG in a manner identical to that used in our previous report. Tonic REM EEG epochs were preconditioned, spectrally analyzed and compared with known populations of control and AD EEG spectra. Instances when a given depressed subject's spectra fell within spectral zones unique to control or AD populations formed a diagnostic score (control, AD, neither of these). Diagnostic scores correctly identified 88% (21/24) of cognitively unimpaired seniors with major depressive disorder (unipolar). This can be compared with 89% (31/35) of mild AD subjects and 100% (43/43) of control subjects correctly identified in our previous report. This diagnostic also correctly classified as to eventual clinical AD/not AD outcome 8 subjects with both major depressive disorder and validated memory complaints. The diagnostic discrimination of AD is based on the fact that AD subjects have significantly less tonic REM EEG energy in the 13-30 Hz frequency range and more in the 1-10 Hz range than control or depressed subjects, as shown in conventional spectral analysis.
在之前的一份报告中,对整夜睡眠脑电图中的紧张性快速眼动睡眠时段进行了处理和分析,以得出一种诊断方法,用于区分轻度阿尔茨海默病(AD)和认知未受损的对照受试者。在此,我们检验了这种诊断方法在区分抑郁症和AD方面的特异性。对24名患有重度抑郁症(单相)的认知未受损老年人(年龄63±1.3岁)进行了整夜脑电图监测,监测方式与我们之前报告中使用的相同。对紧张性快速眼动脑电图时段进行预处理、频谱分析,并与对照和AD脑电图频谱的已知群体进行比较。当给定抑郁症患者的频谱落在对照或AD群体特有的频谱区域内时,这些情况构成一个诊断分数(对照、AD、两者都不是)。诊断分数正确识别出88%(21/24)患有重度抑郁症(单相)的认知未受损老年人。这可以与我们之前报告中正确识别出的89%(31/35)的轻度AD受试者和100%(43/43)的对照受试者进行比较。这种诊断方法还正确地将8名患有重度抑郁症且有经证实的记忆主诉的受试者分类为最终临床AD/非AD结局。AD的诊断区分基于这样一个事实,即如传统频谱分析所示,AD受试者在13 - 30Hz频率范围内的紧张性快速眼动脑电图能量明显低于对照或抑郁症受试者,而在1 - 10Hz范围内则更高。