Emmelin A, Nyström L, Wall S
Department of Public Health and Environmental Studies, Umeå University, Sweden.
Epidemiology. 1993 May;4(3):237-44.
We studied 50 lung cancer cases and 154 matched referents, all dock workers, for whom we obtained smoking information and employment histories. We assessed exposures from information on annual diesel fuel consumption from each of the 15 ports included. We used a smoker/nonsmoker term and three exposure variables (machine time, cumulative fuel, and exposed time with fuel consumption above a minimum cutpoint) in the analyses, with three categories for each exposure variable. Odds ratios (ORs) for medium and high exposure groups are consistently higher than reference (low), with an increasing exposure-response trend that is most marked for the exposed time variable (ORs: low = 1.0; medium = 1.6; high = 2.8). When smoking and that exposure variable are simultaneously included in the analyses, odds ratios for the medium (OR = 2.7) and high (OR = 6.8) levels of exposure increase, as does the odds ratio for smoking. Separating smokers and nonsmokers, with the low exposed nonsmokers as the common reference category, the odds ratios are 1.6 (medium) and 2.9 (high) for the nonsmokers, and 10.7 (medium) and 28.9 (high) for smokers. These results indicate an independent effect of diesel exhaust exposure and a strong interaction between smoking and diesel exhaust.
我们研究了50例肺癌患者和154名匹配的对照者,他们均为码头工人,我们获取了他们的吸烟信息和工作经历。我们根据所纳入的15个港口各自的年度柴油消耗量信息评估暴露情况。在分析中,我们使用了吸烟者/非吸烟者术语以及三个暴露变量(机器运转时间、累积燃料量以及燃料消耗高于最低切点的暴露时间),每个暴露变量分为三类。中、高暴露组的优势比(OR)始终高于参照组(低暴露组),且呈现出暴露-反应的递增趋势,其中以暴露时间变量最为显著(OR:低暴露组 = 1.0;中暴露组 = 1.6;高暴露组 = 2.8)。当在分析中同时纳入吸烟因素和该暴露变量时,中暴露水平(OR = 2.7)和高暴露水平(OR = 6.8)的优势比以及吸烟的优势比均会增加。将吸烟者和非吸烟者分开,以低暴露的非吸烟者作为共同参照类别,非吸烟者的优势比在中暴露水平为1.6,高暴露水平为2.9;吸烟者的优势比在中暴露水平为10.7,高暴露水平为28.9。这些结果表明柴油废气暴露具有独立作用,且吸烟与柴油废气之间存在强烈的交互作用。