Cohen T J, Chin M C, Oliver D G, Scheinman M M, Griffin J C
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1993 Jun;16(6):1285-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1993.tb01715.x.
Ventricular fibrillation (VF) that fails to respond to transthoracic defibrillation leaves the clinician with few alternatives. The purpose of this study was to develop a technique of rescue defibrillation by use of transesophageal electrodes. Fourteen anesthetized dogs (20-30 kg) were investigated in this study. Two electrodes (300 mm2) were mounted 8 cm apart on an esophageal probe and inserted approximately 40 cm from the mouth. VF was induced using AC current delivered to the myocardium. Defibrillation was then performed between the distal electrode (anode) and anterior skin patch (cathode). After 15 seconds of induced VF, transesophageal and transthoracic defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) were determined in random order. The esophageal DFT (90 +/- 15 joules) tended to be lower than the transthoracic DFT (115 +/- 35 joules), though this difference was not statistically significant. One dog could not be defibrillated by transthoracic defibrillation but responded to transesophageal defibrillation. Esophageal electrodes were also useful for arrhythmia discrimination and ventricular pacing (pacing threshold of 38 +/- 5 mA at a pulse duration of 2.5 msec). Following transesophageal DFT determination, in ten dogs (total energy of 600 +/- 150 joules), acute esophageal histopathology demonstrated mild to severe focal injury to the mucosa and/or muscular layers. However, esophagi in four chronic dogs (total energy of 470 +/- 110 joules) showed no gross evidence of mucosal damage, perforation, or stricture 4 weeks following defibrillation. Histopathology showed only focal myocyte atrophy and repair. As a last resort, transesophageal defibrillation was performed in the emergency room on four patients with out-of-hospital refractory VF who failed > 6 high energy transthoracic shocks.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
对经胸除颤无反应的心室颤动(VF)使临床医生几乎无计可施。本研究的目的是开发一种使用经食管电极进行抢救除颤的技术。本研究对14只麻醉的犬(20 - 30千克)进行了调查。将两个电极(300平方毫米)相隔8厘米安装在一个食管探头上,并从口腔插入约40厘米。使用输送到心肌的交流电诱发VF。然后在远端电极(阳极)和胸前皮肤贴片(阴极)之间进行除颤。在诱发VF 15秒后,随机顺序测定经食管和经胸除颤阈值(DFT)。食管DFT(90±15焦耳)倾向于低于经胸DFT(115±35焦耳),尽管这种差异无统计学意义。一只犬经胸除颤无效,但对经食管除颤有反应。食管电极也可用于心律失常鉴别和心室起搏(脉宽2.5毫秒时起搏阈值为38±5毫安)。在测定经食管DFT后,10只犬(总能量600±150焦耳)的急性食管组织病理学显示黏膜和/或肌层有轻度至重度局灶性损伤。然而,4只慢性犬(总能量470±110焦耳)的食管在除颤后4周未显示黏膜损伤、穿孔或狭窄的明显证据。组织病理学仅显示局灶性心肌细胞萎缩和修复。作为最后手段,在急诊室对4例院外难治性VF且经6次以上高能量经胸电击无效的患者进行了经食管除颤。(摘要截短至250字)