Schimek F, Fahle M
Eberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen, Germany.
Br J Ophthalmol. 1995 Feb;79(2):166-73. doi: 10.1136/bjo.79.2.166.
The efficacy of different techniques of facial nerve block for cataract surgery was investigated. Forty four patients underwent either modified O'Brien, Atkinson, van Lint, or lid blocks. Intentional muscle activity of the orbicularis oculi muscle was recorded and the area under the EMG curve calculated for quantitative comparison of muscle activity between the groups before and after injection of lignocaine with the vasoconstrictor naphazoline nitrate. In addition, the force of lid closure was measured and lid motility determined on a subjective score scale. Whereas the modified O'Brien and lid blocks nearly abolished the muscle activity recorded in the EMG (p < 0.003), the Atkinson and van Lint blocks did not significantly affect these variables. The O'Brien and lid blocks decreased the force of lid closure and lid movements far more effectively than the Atkinson and van Lint blocks (p < 0.0001). The topographic distribution of a mixture of metrizamide and lignocaine solutions was evaluated radiographically in eight additional patients, to assess potential causes for differences in the efficacy of the block techniques. The radiological results showed involvement of the region of the facial nerve trunk and its temporal and cervical divisions by the modified O'Brien block. The lid block, on the other hand, affected terminal branches of the facial nerve's temporal division. In this study, complete lid akinesia was achieved by both the modified O'Brien block and the lid block. However, because the modified O'Brien block involves the risk of neural injury to the facial nerve or its main divisions, the lid block is recommended as the most effective and safe method to achieve akinesia of the orbicularis oculi muscle.
研究了不同面神经阻滞技术在白内障手术中的疗效。44例患者接受了改良奥布赖恩阻滞、阿特金森阻滞、范林特阻滞或眼睑阻滞中的一种。记录眼轮匝肌的随意肌肉活动,并计算肌电图曲线下面积,以定量比较注射含血管收缩剂硝酸萘甲唑啉的利多卡因前后各组间的肌肉活动。此外,测量眼睑闭合力量,并根据主观评分量表确定眼睑活动度。改良奥布赖恩阻滞和眼睑阻滞几乎消除了肌电图记录的肌肉活动(p<0.003),而阿特金森阻滞和范林特阻滞对这些变量没有显著影响。奥布赖恩阻滞和眼睑阻滞比阿特金森阻滞和范林特阻滞更有效地降低了眼睑闭合力量和眼睑活动度(p<0.0001)。在另外8例患者中,通过影像学评估了甲泛葡胺和利多卡因溶液混合物的局部分布,以评估阻滞技术疗效差异的潜在原因。放射学结果显示改良奥布赖恩阻滞累及面神经干及其颞支和颈支区域。另一方面,眼睑阻滞影响面神经颞支的终末分支。在本研究中,改良奥布赖恩阻滞和眼睑阻滞均实现了完全性眼睑运动不能。然而,由于改良奥布赖恩阻滞存在对面神经或其主要分支造成神经损伤的风险,因此推荐眼睑阻滞作为实现眼轮匝肌运动不能的最有效和安全的方法。