Blijham G H
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Support Care Cancer. 1995 Jan;3(1):61-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00343922.
In the Netherlands medical decisions concerning end of life (MDEL) play a role in 38% of all deaths. Euthanasia, defined as an intentional termination of life by somebody else at an individual's request, is done in 1.8% of deaths. Only 4% of Dutch physicians would never perform or refer for euthanasia, and over 50% have performed euthanasia. Around 25,000 Dutch patients per year bring up euthanasia as a possibility in case suffering becomes unbearable; around 10% will finally have euthanasia performed. On the basis of these opinions and data the Dutch legislation has recently been reformed. Euthanasia remains a crime and each case will be reviewed by the district attorney. Court decisions, however, have confirmed the view that in some cases of euthanasia the physician may be confronted with conflicting obligations and therefore will not be punished. As a consequence, cases fulfilling a number of requirements will not be prosecuted. In conclusion, MDEL including euthanasia are considered ethically justifiable and legally permissible if they are part of an open, honest and careful approach to patients with unbearable suffering, in particular in the case of cancer.
在荷兰,与临终相关的医疗决策(MDEL)在所有死亡案例中占比38%。安乐死,即应个人请求由他人故意终止生命,在1.8%的死亡案例中实施。只有4%的荷兰医生永远不会实施或推荐安乐死,超过50%的医生实施过安乐死。每年约有2.5万名荷兰患者在痛苦变得无法忍受时提出安乐死的可能性;最终约10%的患者会接受安乐死。基于这些观点和数据,荷兰近期对相关立法进行了改革。安乐死仍然是一种犯罪行为,每个案例都将由地方检察官审查。然而,法院判决确认了这样一种观点,即在某些安乐死案例中,医生可能面临相互冲突的义务,因此不会受到惩罚。结果,符合若干要求的案例将不会被起诉。总之,如果临终相关医疗决策(包括安乐死)是对遭受无法忍受痛苦的患者采取开放、诚实和谨慎态度的一部分,特别是在癌症患者的情况下,那么这些决策在伦理上被认为是合理的,在法律上也是允许的。