• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The use of multiple-choice tests in anatomy: common pitfalls and how to avoid them.

作者信息

Vahalia K V, Subramaniam K, Marks S C, De Souza E J

机构信息

Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.

出版信息

Clin Anat. 1995;8(1):61-5. doi: 10.1002/ca.980080111.

DOI:10.1002/ca.980080111
PMID:7697515
Abstract

Multiple-choice questions (MCQ) are widely used to evaluate students in the health sciences, including anatomy. Unusual responses in 90 simple MCQ examinations have been identified and classified as to cause, including a number of illustrated examples. About one-quarter of these errors were attributable to the teacher and could have been avoided by a critical analysis of the questions before use. The increasing use of sophisticated formats of the MCQ in medical education indicates that teachers need to analyze their questions more carefully before and after actual tests to minimize errors.

摘要

相似文献

1
The use of multiple-choice tests in anatomy: common pitfalls and how to avoid them.
Clin Anat. 1995;8(1):61-5. doi: 10.1002/ca.980080111.
2
[Experience with the written examination (multiple choice test) in the teaching of anatomy].
Anat Anz. 1975;137(1-2):59-64.
3
Answering multiple-choice questions in high-stakes medical examinations.在高风险医学考试中回答多项选择题。
Med Educ. 2005 Sep;39(9):890-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02243.x.
4
Assessment of spatial anatomical knowledge with a 'three-dimensional multiple choice test' (3D-MC).使用“三维多项选择题测试”(3D-MC)评估空间解剖学知识。
Med Teach. 2009 Jan;31(1):e13-7. doi: 10.1080/01421590802334325.
5
Evaluation of small-group teaching in human gross anatomy in a Caribbean medical school.加勒比地区一所医学院人体大体解剖学小组教学的评估
Anat Sci Educ. 2008 Jan;1(1):19-22. doi: 10.1002/ase.8.
6
Evaluation of practical sessions in clinical anatomy: a strategy for educational improvement.临床解剖学实践课程评估:教育改进策略
Clin Anat. 2002 Jan;15(1):51-5. doi: 10.1002/ca.1092.
7
The anatomy of teaching and the teaching of anatomy.教学的剖析与解剖学教学
Am Surg. 2004 Apr;70(4):366-8.
8
Proceedings: Studies on the relative merits of essay, multiple choice and viva voce examinations in Anatomy.
J Anat. 1974 Nov;118(Pt 2):403.
9
A follow-up comparative study of two modes of learning human anatomy: by dissection and from prosections.两种人体解剖学学习模式的随访比较研究:解剖法与预制解剖标本法。
Clin Anat. 1996;9(4):258-62. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1996)9:4<258::AID-CA8>3.0.CO;2-A.
10
Integrating physical examination and trunk anatomy; a new course for second year medical students.整合体格检查与躯干解剖学;面向医学二年级学生的一门新课程。
Med Teach. 2007 Nov;29(9):975-7. doi: 10.1080/01421590701589219.

引用本文的文献

1
Illustrated versus non-illustrated anatomical test items in anatomy course tests and German Medical Licensing examinations (M1).解剖学课程测试和德国医学执照考试(M1)中带插图与不带插图的解剖学测试项目
GMS J Med Educ. 2018 May 15;35(2):Doc25. doi: 10.3205/zma001172. eCollection 2018.
2
Improving Measures via Examining the Behavior of Distractors in Multiple-Choice Tests: Assessment and Remediation.通过检查多项选择题中干扰项的表现来改进措施:评估与补救
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Jan;77(1):82-103. doi: 10.1177/0013164416637107. Epub 2017 Jan 4.