Haynes K A, Sullivan D J, Coleman D C, Clarke J C, Emilianus R, Atkinson C, Cann K J
Department of Medical Microbiology, Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School, London, United Kingdom.
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jan;33(1):99-102. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.1.99-102.1995.
We compared the abilities of random amplification of polymorphic DNA and DNA fingerprinting, with oligonucleotide probes, to type five pairs of Cryptococcus neoformans clinical isolates recovered from five separate human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients in London, England. The two techniques had comparable discriminatory abilities when applied to these isolates. A total of eight different isolate types were demonstrated in these patients. No isolate type was observed in more than one patient. Two of the isolate pairs recovered from single episodes of cryptococcosis within 1 day of each other were genotypically indistinguishable by both methods. The other three pairs of isolates were all distinguishable. One of these isolate pairs was obtained from a single episode of cryptococcosis, while the other two were obtained from recurrent infections. These results indicate that multiple strains of C. neoformans may be responsible for a single episode of cryptococcosis and that recurrent infection may occur as a result of reinfection with a novel strain.
我们比较了多态性DNA随机扩增技术和使用寡核苷酸探针的DNA指纹技术对从英国伦敦五名不同的人类免疫缺陷病毒阳性患者中分离出的五对新型隐球菌临床分离株进行分型的能力。当应用于这些分离株时,这两种技术具有相当的鉴别能力。这些患者中共显示出八种不同的分离株类型。没有一种分离株类型在不止一名患者中被观察到。在彼此相隔1天内从单次隐球菌病发作中分离出的两对分离株,通过两种方法在基因分型上无法区分。其他三对分离株都可以区分。其中一对分离株来自单次隐球菌病发作,而另外两对来自复发性感染。这些结果表明,新型隐球菌的多种菌株可能导致单次隐球菌病发作,而复发性感染可能是由于再次感染新菌株所致。