• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗旋转单颗牙基牙的比较研究

Comparative study of antirotational single tooth abutments.

作者信息

Balfour A, O'Brien G R

机构信息

Southern California Implant Institute, Glendale.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 1995 Jan;73(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80270-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80270-7
PMID:7699597
Abstract

Identifying the functional and mechanical limitations of single tooth implant systems is essential for the long-term success of the restoration. Three designs with different prosthetic connections were evaluated with their corresponding single tooth abutments for structural integrity and cyclic fatigue. The internal implant octagon was the weakest connection under off-axis impact loading and lateral loading, and the external hexagon implant was rendered unrestorable under lateral loading. Overall, the internal hexagon design was found to provide the highest degree of single tooth stability. This was attributed to the increased material strength of the titanium alloy implant in comparison to the softer CP titanium implant, and to the abutment's longer, 1-degree tapered mating hexagon.

摘要

识别单颗牙种植系统的功能和机械局限性对于修复体的长期成功至关重要。对三种具有不同修复连接方式的设计及其相应的单颗牙基台进行了结构完整性和循环疲劳评估。种植体内部八角形在非轴向冲击载荷和侧向载荷下是最薄弱的连接,而外部六角形种植体在侧向载荷下无法修复。总体而言,发现内部六角形设计提供了最高程度的单颗牙稳定性。这归因于与较软的纯钛种植体相比,钛合金种植体材料强度的增加,以及基台更长的、1度锥形配合六角形。

相似文献

1
Comparative study of antirotational single tooth abutments.抗旋转单颗牙基牙的比较研究
J Prosthet Dent. 1995 Jan;73(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80270-7.
2
Comparison of Customized Abutments Made from Titanium and a Machinable Precious Alloy.钛制定制基台与可加工贵金属合金定制基台的比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jan-Feb;31(1):92-100. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4102.
3
Evaluation of the precision of fit between the Procera custom abutment and various implant systems.Procera定制基台与各种种植系统之间适配精度的评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Sep-Oct;18(5):652-8.
4
In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.体外研究连接类型对内连接和外连接氧化锆基台的骨折负荷的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Sep-Oct;24(5):850-8.
5
Influence of the height of the external hexagon and surface treatment on fatigue life of commercially pure titanium dental implants.外六角高度及表面处理对商业纯钛牙种植体疲劳寿命的影响
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):583-90.
6
Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.疲劳测试后种植体-基台界面的检查。
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Mar;85(3):268-75. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.114266.
7
Implant-abutment connections: influence of the design on the microgap and their fatigue and fracture behavior of dental implants.种植体-基台连接:设计对种植体微间隙及其疲劳和断裂行为的影响。
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2014 Jul;25(7):1825-30. doi: 10.1007/s10856-014-5211-7. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
8
Stability of implant-abutment interface with a hexagon-mediated butt joint: failure mode and bending resistance.带六边形介导对接接头的种植体-基台界面稳定性:失效模式与抗弯曲性
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7(4):221-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00067.x.
9
Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.平台连接和基台材料对单颗前牙种植支持修复体应力分布的影响:非线性三维有限元分析
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Nov;112(5):1096-102. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.015. Epub 2014 May 13.
10
Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.牙种植体-基台界面的动态疲劳特性:大直径与标准直径六面体型种植体的关节开口情况
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Jun;85(6):599-607. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.115250.

引用本文的文献

1
Finite Element Analysis and Fatigue Test of INTEGRA Dental Implant System.INTEGRA牙科种植系统的有限元分析与疲劳测试
Materials (Basel). 2024 Mar 6;17(5):1213. doi: 10.3390/ma17051213.
2
Compressive Strength Evaluation of Three Distinct Implant Design Approaches.三种不同种植体设计方法的抗压强度评估
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 2):S1126-S1128. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_193_23. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
3
Effects of insertion torque on the structure of dental implants with different connections: Experimental pilot study in vitro.
不同连接方式的种植体结构的植入扭矩影响:体外实验性初步研究。
PLoS One. 2021 May 19;16(5):e0251904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251904. eCollection 2021.
4
Evaluation of reverse torque values and failure loads of three different abutment designs with internal connections.对三种具有内部连接的不同基台设计的反向扭矩值和破坏载荷的评估。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2020 Dec 10;17(6):439-446. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.
5
Optimized Planning and Evaluation of Dental Implant Fatigue Testing: A Specific Software Application.牙科种植体疲劳测试的优化规划与评估:一种特定的软件应用程序
Biology (Basel). 2020 Oct 31;9(11):372. doi: 10.3390/biology9110372.
6
Deformation of the Internal Connection of Narrow Implants after Insertion in Dense Bone: An in Vitro Study.窄种植体植入致密骨后内部连接的变形:一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2019 Jun 6;12(11):1833. doi: 10.3390/ma12111833.
7
In Vitro Evaluation of Manual Torque Values Applied to Implant-Abutment Complex by Different Clinicians and Abutment Screw Loosening.不同临床医生对种植体-基台复合体施加的手动扭矩值及基台螺钉松动情况的体外评估
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:7376261. doi: 10.1155/2017/7376261. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
8
The fracture strength by a torsion test at the implant-abutment interface.种植体-基台界面处通过扭转试验测得的断裂强度。
Int J Implant Dent. 2015 Dec;1(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40729-015-0027-x. Epub 2015 Oct 10.
9
A three-dimensional finite element analysis of a passive and friction fit implant abutment interface and the influence of occlusal table dimension on the stress distribution pattern on the implant and surrounding bone.被动和摩擦配合种植体基台界面的三维有限元分析以及咬合面尺寸对种植体和周围骨应力分布模式的影响。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2015 Jul-Sep;15(3):229-36. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.161559.
10
Technical complications of implant-causes and management: A comprehensive review.植入物的技术并发症:病因与管理——全面综述
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Jan-Jun;6(1):3-8. doi: 10.4103/0975-5950.168233.