Suppr超能文献

用于支原体感染诊断的DNA探针与聚合酶链反应

DNA probes and PCR in diagnosis of mycoplasma infections.

作者信息

Razin S

机构信息

Department of Membrane and Ulstrastructure Research, Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Mol Cell Probes. 1994 Dec;8(6):497-511. doi: 10.1006/mcpr.1994.1071.

Abstract

Laboratory diagnosis of mycoplasma infections is hampered by the difficulty or total failure to cultivate the organisms in vitro, and by the frequently weak and poorly specific serological response of the host. DNA probes consisting of cloned ribosomal RNA genes, cDNA to mycoplasmal rRNA, synthetic 16S rRNA oligonucleotide sequences, or cloned mycoplasmal protein genes, have been developed and applied as diagnostic tools in a variety of human and animal mycoplasma infections. These included primary atypical pneumonia caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae, urogenital infections associated with M. genitalium and Ureaplasma urealyticum, and infections with M. fermentans, M. penetrans or M. pirum--mycoplasmas recently incriminated as cofactors in AIDS. DNA probes were also designed to aid in diagnosis of mycoplasma diseases of farm and laboratory animals, and the hard-to-diagnose mycoplasma infections of cell cultures. Sensitivity of mycoplasma detection by the different probes ranged between 10(3) and 10(6) colony-forming units, a level which may not be sufficiently high for use in a clinical laboratory. The introduction of PCR has pushed aside the previously developed DNA probes, by providing faster and much more sensitive tests. The sensitive level of a PCR test can be as low as a single organism, enabling detection of mycoplasmas in patients treated with antibiotics and in asymptomatic patients. PCR becomes positive prior to serological response and is also effective in immunocompromised hosts. PCR was shown to be most valuable in detection and identification of the non-culturable plant and insect mycoplasma-like organisms (MLOs). Nevertheless, false-negative PCR results are rather common due to inhibitors of the PCR reaction in the clinical specimen, while false-positive results may occur due to contamination of the reagents with target DNA. In conclusion, the PCR procedure is still too complex to be carried out in a routine diagnostic laboratory. PCR prepackaged quality-controlled diagnostic kits are now in the process of rapid development. Once these kits become available, and at a reasonable cost, PCR will certainly take its place as a major diagnostic tool in the routine diagnosis of mycoplasma infections.

摘要

支原体感染的实验室诊断受到阻碍,原因在于体外培养该微生物存在困难甚至完全无法培养,以及宿主的血清学反应通常较弱且特异性差。由克隆的核糖体RNA基因、支原体rRNA的cDNA、合成的16S rRNA寡核苷酸序列或克隆的支原体蛋白基因组成的DNA探针已被开发出来,并作为诊断工具应用于多种人类和动物支原体感染。这些感染包括由肺炎支原体引起的原发性非典型肺炎、与生殖支原体和解脲脲原体相关的泌尿生殖道感染,以及与发酵支原体、穿透支原体或梨支原体感染——这些支原体最近被认为是艾滋病的辅助因子。DNA探针还被设计用于辅助诊断农场动物和实验动物的支原体疾病,以及细胞培养中难以诊断的支原体感染。不同探针检测支原体的灵敏度在10³至10⁶个菌落形成单位之间,这一水平对于临床实验室来说可能不够高。PCR的引入已取代了先前开发的DNA探针,因为它提供了更快且更灵敏的检测方法。PCR检测的灵敏水平可低至单个微生物,能够在接受抗生素治疗的患者和无症状患者中检测到支原体。PCR在血清学反应之前呈阳性,在免疫功能低下的宿主中也有效。PCR在检测和鉴定不可培养的植物和昆虫类支原体样微生物(MLOs)方面显示出最大价值。然而,由于临床标本中存在PCR反应抑制剂,假阴性PCR结果相当常见,而由于试剂被靶DNA污染,可能会出现假阳性结果。总之,PCR程序仍然过于复杂,无法在常规诊断实验室中进行。PCR预包装的质量控制诊断试剂盒目前正在快速开发中。一旦这些试剂盒上市且价格合理,PCR肯定会成为支原体感染常规诊断中的主要诊断工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验