Edström K G
Bull World Health Organ. 1975;52(2):141-8.
In recent years many authors have claimed that the combination of tubal sterilization and induced abortion carries too high a morbidity and that the two operations should preferrably be performed separately. As this standpoint has serious practical consequences for many women undergoing abortion, a review of the literature was undertaken to see whether there are any data supporting it. No direct comparison of the morbidity accompanying the combined procedure and the total morbidity from the two procedures performed with an interval could be found. Indirect evidence suggests that the effect of an interval between the operations-if any-is negligible compared with the influence upon morbidity of factors such as methods of sterilization and abortion, health status, and age. To gain direct information on the problem, a multicentre study has been designed by the Task Force on Sequelae and Complications of Induced Abortion. The outlines of this study are briefly described.
近年来，许多作者声称输卵管绝育术与人工流产相结合的发病率过高，这两种手术最好分开进行。由于这一观点对许多接受流产手术的女性具有严重的实际影响，因此对文献进行了综述，以查看是否有任何数据支持这一观点。未发现对联合手术的发病率与间隔进行这两种手术的总发病率的直接比较。间接证据表明，手术间隔的影响（如果有的话）与绝育和流产方法、健康状况及年龄等因素对发病率的影响相比可忽略不计。为了获取有关该问题的直接信息，人工流产后遗症和并发症特别工作组设计了一项多中心研究。本文简要介绍了该研究的概况。
