• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

供体类型对黑人和白人肾移植受者肾移植存活率的相对影响。

Relative impact of donor type on renal allograft survival in black and white recipients.

作者信息

Ojo A O, Port F K, Mauger E A, Wolfe R A, Leichtman A B

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 1995 Apr;25(4):623-8. doi: 10.1016/0272-6386(95)90134-5.

DOI:10.1016/0272-6386(95)90134-5
PMID:7702061
Abstract

Renal allograft survival of organs from living-related donors (LRDs) is superior to that of organs from cadaveric donors (CAD). Allograft survival rates are lower in black recipients of both CAD and LRD transplants compared with recipients of other races. It is not known whether the superior donor effect of LRD varies between races. We investigated the graft survival outcome of first renal transplants performed in the United States in 1986 and 1989 to determine whether the donor effect differs between black and white recipients. A measurement of "donor type effect" is introduced. There were 7,002 and 7,307 first renal transplants in 1986 and 1989, respectively, for which allograft survival data were available from the United States Renal Data Systems. Both black and white recipients showed a greater than 50% reduction in the risk of allograft loss at all the points studied up to 5 years posttransplant when LRD was chosen over CAD transplantation. A measurement of donor type effect indicates that graft loss is reduced by 7 to 21 percentage points at 1 and 5 years posttransplant. The donor type effect is proportionally equal in both races. Therefore, kidney donation from living relatives as a first transplant should be encouraged for all medically suitable end-stage renal disease patients as a means of improving outcome and reducing CAD transplantation waiting time for patients in whom LRD transplants cannot be performed.

摘要

来自活体亲属供者(LRD)的肾脏移植器官的存活情况优于尸体供者(CAD)的器官。与其他种族的受者相比,CAD和LRD移植的黑人受者的移植器官存活率较低。尚不清楚LRD的优越供者效应在不同种族之间是否存在差异。我们调查了1986年和1989年在美国进行的首次肾移植的移植存活结果,以确定黑人与白人受者之间的供者效应是否不同。引入了“供者类型效应”的衡量指标。1986年和1989年分别有7002例和7307例首次肾移植,其移植器官存活数据可从美国肾脏数据系统获得。当选择LRD移植而非CAD移植时,在移植后长达5年的所有研究时间点,黑人和白人受者的移植器官丢失风险均降低了50%以上。供者类型效应的衡量指标表明,移植后1年和5年时移植器官丢失率降低了7至21个百分点。两个种族的供者类型效应在比例上是相等的。因此,对于所有医学上适合的终末期肾病患者,应鼓励亲属活体供肾作为首次移植,以改善移植结果,并减少无法进行LRD移植的患者等待CAD移植的时间。

相似文献

1
Relative impact of donor type on renal allograft survival in black and white recipients.供体类型对黑人和白人肾移植受者肾移植存活率的相对影响。
Am J Kidney Dis. 1995 Apr;25(4):623-8. doi: 10.1016/0272-6386(95)90134-5.
2
The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry.美国器官共享联合网络科学肾脏移植登记处。
Clin Transpl. 1996:1-14.
3
Annual trends and triple therapy--1991-2000.1991 - 2000年的年度趋势与三联疗法
Clin Transpl. 2001:247-69.
4
Influence of race on renal allograft survival in the pre- and postcyclosporine era.
Clin Transpl. 1987:217-33.
5
Living unrelated donors in kidney transplants: better long-term results than with non-HLA-identical living related donors?肾移植中活体非亲属供体:长期结果是否优于 HLA 不匹配的活体亲属供体?
Transplantation. 2000 May 15;69(9):1942-5. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200005150-00033.
6
A single-center experience with six-antigen-matched kidney transplants.六抗原匹配肾移植的单中心经验
Arch Surg. 1995 Mar;130(3):277-82. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430030047008.
7
Chronic allograft nephropathy uniformly affects recipients of cadaveric, nonidentical living-related, and living-unrelated grafts.慢性移植肾肾病会同等程度地影响尸体供肾移植受者、非同基因亲属活体供肾移植受者以及非亲属活体供肾移植受者。
Transplantation. 2003 May 27;75(10):1677-82. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000063830.60937.06.
8
Factors influencing short-term and long-term pediatric renal transplant survival.影响小儿肾移植短期和长期存活的因素。
J Pediatr. 1997 Mar;130(3):455-62. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)70210-5.
9
Renal transplantations performed using non-heart-beating organ donors: going back to the future?使用非心脏跳动器官捐献者进行肾移植:回归未来?
Transplantation. 2002 Dec 27;74(12):1715-20. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200212270-00013.
10
Adult-size kidneys without acute tubular necrosis provide exceedingly superior long-term graft outcomes for infants and small children: a single center and UNOS analysis. United Network for Organ Sharing.无急性肾小管坏死的成人尺寸肾脏为婴幼儿提供了极其优异的长期移植效果:单中心及器官共享联合网络(UNOS)分析。器官共享联合网络
Transplantation. 2000 Dec 27;70(12):1728-36. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200012270-00012.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative analysis of survival of patients on dialysis and after kidney transplantation.透析患者与肾移植患者生存率的比较分析。
Clin Kidney J. 2018 Jun;11(3):389-393. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfx117. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
2
Protocol of the KTFT-TALK study to reduce racial disparities in kidney transplant evaluation and living donor kidney transplantation.KTFT-TALK研究方案:减少肾移植评估及活体供肾移植中的种族差异
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Feb;53:52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.11.011. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
3
An overview of disparities and interventions in pediatric kidney transplantation worldwide.
全球儿童肾移植的差异与干预概述。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2015 Jul;30(7):1077-86. doi: 10.1007/s00467-014-2879-3. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
4
Peripheral blood antigen-presenting cells from African-Americans exhibit increased CD80 and CD86 expression.非裔美国人的外周血抗原呈递细胞表现出CD80和CD86表达增加。
Clin Exp Immunol. 1999 Nov;118(2):247-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1999.01051.x.