Stephens C, Masamu E T, Kiama M G, Keto A J, Kinenekejo M, Ichimori K, Lines J
Department of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, England.
Bull World Health Organ. 1995;73(1):97-104.
A study of community awareness of mosquitos and related subjects in the residential areas of two Tanzanian cities (Dar es Salaam and Tanga) showed that residents were well aware of mosquitos. Almost all claimed to use some form of domestic mosquito control product for their personal protection, and many spend a significant portion of the household income on this. The problems of nuisance-biting and malaria transmission are usually not separated and are considered to be the result of poor environmental hygiene, for which both residents and local authorities are responsible. Although Culex mosquitos are not a primary target of the Urban Malaria Control Project (UMCP), the persistence of nuisance-biting has made residents sceptical and dissatisfied with insecticide spraying. The residents' priorities are evidently not the same as those of the health authorities, yet mutual cooperation is essential. In order to maintain community support, campaigns aimed at malaria vectors should consider the need for additional measures to control Culex mosquitos, such as those now being tried by the UMCP. Mosquito breeding sites are non-specifically associated with rubbish and standing water of all kinds, and so the actions that the community considers necessary for mosquito source reduction tend to be poorly targeted. Residents do not recognize that some sources produce malaria mosquitos while others produce nuisance mosquitos. The environmental anti-mosquito measures currently promoted by health education and other forms of propaganda are also poorly targeted. While some of them are directed at important Culex breeding sites, others are aimed at sites of little importance for mosquitos of any kind.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
一项关于坦桑尼亚两个城市(达累斯萨拉姆和坦噶)居民区蚊虫及相关主题的社区认知研究表明,居民对蚊虫非常了解。几乎所有人都声称使用某种家用蚊虫控制产品来进行个人防护,而且许多人将家庭收入的很大一部分花在这上面。叮咬骚扰问题和疟疾传播问题通常没有区分开来,被认为是环境卫生差的结果,居民和地方当局都对此负有责任。尽管库蚊不是城市疟疾控制项目(UMCP)的主要目标,但叮咬骚扰问题的持续存在使居民对杀虫剂喷洒持怀疑和不满态度。居民的优先事项显然与卫生当局不同,但相互合作至关重要。为了维持社区支持,针对疟疾媒介的宣传活动应考虑采取额外措施来控制库蚊,比如UMCP目前正在尝试的那些措施。蚊虫滋生地与各种垃圾和积水并无特定关联,因此社区认为减少蚊虫滋生源头所需采取的行动往往针对性不强。居民没有认识到有些源头滋生传播疟疾的蚊虫,而有些则滋生骚扰性蚊虫。目前通过健康教育和其他宣传形式所推广的环境防蚊措施针对性也很差。其中一些措施针对重要的库蚊滋生地,而另一些则针对对任何种类蚊虫都不太重要的地方。(摘要截选至250字)