Lanza M L, Kayne H L
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 1995 Mar-Apr;16(2):129-41. doi: 10.3109/01612849509006930.
The purpose of this study was to compare the perceptions of assaultive patients and staff victims regarding assault incidents. The hypotheses were as follows: (1) There will be congruence between patients' and victims' reports of objective or factual information regarding the assaults and (2) there will not be congruence between patients' and victims' reports of subjective information about the assaults. Monahan's (1981) framework was used for assessing violence on the assaultive patient and the assaulted staff member. Patients who assaulted a nursing staff member and nursing staff members who were assaulted were interviewed, and the congruence of responses between each pair (patient and staff member) on each question was assessed. For 10 items designated as objective, there was agreement between patients and victims in 6 cases and disagreement in 4 cases. For 8 subjective items, in all cases patients and victims gave different perceptions.
本研究的目的是比较攻击性患者和工作人员受害者对攻击事件的看法。假设如下：（1）患者和受害者关于攻击事件的客观或事实信息报告将一致；（2）患者和受害者关于攻击事件的主观信息报告将不一致。采用莫纳汉（1981年）的框架评估攻击性患者和受攻击工作人员的暴力行为。对攻击护理人员的患者和受攻击的护理人员进行了访谈，并评估了每对（患者和工作人员）在每个问题上的回答一致性。对于指定为客观的10项内容，患者和受害者在6例中意见一致，4例中意见不一致。对于8项主观内容，在所有情况下患者和受害者给出了不同的看法。
