Corrigan P W
University of Chicago Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Tinley Park, IL 60477.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1994 Dec;25(4):311-6. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(94)90039-6.
Line-level staff have been trained in behavioral rehabilitation strategies by program developers who believe that this training may lead to better quality of inpatient care. The effects of staff training, however, may be mitigated by characteristics of the various disciplines that constitute the staff. Differences in nursing versus clinical staff may be particularly relevant to inpatient staff training in behavioral rehabilitation. To identify these differences, 80 clinical and 210 nursing staff members at a state hospital completed measures of work-related stress, knowledge of behavior therapy, and impressions of behavioral interventions. Results showed that clinical staff had significantly more formal education and knowledge of behavioral treatment. Nursing staff reported greater work-related stress. Despite these differences, the two samples did not differ in terms of commitment to social learning ideology or perceptions of barriers to behavior therapy. Moreover, the pattern of staff variables that predict social learning ideology or perceptions of barriers to behavior therapy was similar across samples. The impact of differences in clinical and nursing staff on staff training is discussed.
一线工作人员已接受项目开发者的行为康复策略培训,这些开发者认为这种培训可能会提高住院护理质量。然而,工作人员培训的效果可能会受到构成工作人员的各个学科的特点的影响。护理人员与临床工作人员之间的差异可能与行为康复方面的住院工作人员培训特别相关。为了找出这些差异,一家州立医院的80名临床工作人员和210名护理人员完成了与工作相关压力、行为治疗知识以及对行为干预印象的测量。结果显示,临床工作人员接受过更多正规教育,对行为治疗的了解也更多。护理人员报告的工作相关压力更大。尽管存在这些差异,但在对社会学习理念的认同或对行为治疗障碍的认知方面,这两个样本并无不同。此外,预测社会学习理念或对行为治疗障碍认知的工作人员变量模式在不同样本中是相似的。本文讨论了临床和护理人员差异对工作人员培训的影响。