• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保乳术后乳房放疗:一种决策工具的开发与评估

Breast irradiation postlumpectomy: development and evaluation of a decision instrument.

作者信息

Whelan T J, Levine M N, Gafni A, Lukka H, Mohide E A, Patel M, Streiner D L

机构信息

Ontario Cancer Treatment and Research Foundation-Hamilton Regional Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1995 Apr;13(4):847-53. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.4.847.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.1995.13.4.847
PMID:7707110
Abstract

PURPOSE

To develop an instrument to help clinicians inform patients about the benefits and risks of breast irradiation following lumpectomy and to help an informed patient decide whether she prefers this treatment.

METHODS

A Decision Board consisting of written material and visual aids was developed. It provides the patient with detailed information about her choices (breast irradiation or not), outcomes (breast recurrence and survival), probability of those outcomes, and quality of life associated with treatment and outcome. We studied the decision-making process in 82 consecutive node-negative lumpectomy patients who were seen in consultation by a radiation oncologist and oncology nurse. The Decision Board was used in the last 30 patients in the cohort.

RESULTS

Patient comprehension following the consultation without the Decision Board was greater than 65% for all questions addressed, except for poor understanding of the lack of survival benefit associated with breast irradiation (12% of patients answered correctly) and that it could not be repeated (15% of patients answered correctly). Comprehension following the consultation with the Decision Board was similar, but understanding regarding the repetition of radiation (83%) was improved. Only 70% of patients in the no-Decision Board group felt they were offered a choice. This was increased to 97% in the Decision-Board group. Overall, 95% of patients chose breast irradiation, and this did not differ between groups. Patients reported several reasons for choosing breast irradiation, all of equal importance.

CONCLUSION

The Decision Board facilitated shared decision making in node-negative lumpectomy patients who chose breast irradiation, but it did not affect a patient's choice to select breast irradiation.

摘要

目的

研发一种工具,以帮助临床医生向患者告知保乳手术后乳房放疗的益处和风险,并帮助患者在充分知情的情况下决定是否选择这种治疗方法。

方法

开发了一个由书面材料和视觉辅助工具组成的决策板。它为患者提供了有关其选择(是否进行乳房放疗)、结果(乳房复发和生存率)、这些结果的概率以及与治疗和结果相关的生活质量的详细信息。我们研究了82例连续的腋窝淋巴结阴性保乳手术患者的决策过程,这些患者由放射肿瘤学家和肿瘤学护士会诊。该决策板用于该队列中的最后30例患者。

结果

在没有决策板的会诊后,除了对乳房放疗缺乏生存益处(12%的患者回答正确)以及放疗不能重复(15%的患者回答正确)理解较差外,所有问题的患者理解率均超过65%。使用决策板会诊后的理解情况相似,但对放疗可重复性的理解(83%)有所改善。在没有决策板的组中,只有70%的患者认为他们有选择的机会。在决策板组中,这一比例提高到了97%。总体而言,95%的患者选择了乳房放疗,两组之间没有差异。患者报告了选择乳房放疗的几个原因,所有原因同等重要。

结论

决策板有助于腋窝淋巴结阴性保乳手术且选择乳房放疗的患者进行共同决策,但它并未影响患者选择乳房放疗的决定。

相似文献

1
Breast irradiation postlumpectomy: development and evaluation of a decision instrument.保乳术后乳房放疗:一种决策工具的开发与评估
J Clin Oncol. 1995 Apr;13(4):847-53. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.4.847.
2
Mastectomy or lumpectomy? Helping women make informed choices.乳房切除术还是肿块切除术?帮助女性做出明智的选择。
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jun;17(6):1727-35. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.6.1727.
3
Helping patients make informed choices: a randomized trial of a decision aid for adjuvant chemotherapy in lymph node-negative breast cancer.帮助患者做出明智选择:一项关于淋巴结阴性乳腺癌辅助化疗决策辅助工具的随机试验
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Apr 16;95(8):581-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/95.8.581.
4
Preliminary results and evaluation of MammoSite balloon brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation for pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a phase II clinical study.MammoSite球囊近距离放射治疗纯导管原位癌局部乳腺照射的初步结果与评估:一项II期临床研究。
Am J Surg. 2006 Oct;192(4):427-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.013.
5
Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer.一项比较全乳切除术与保乳手术加或不加放疗治疗乳腺癌的随机临床试验的八年结果。
N Engl J Med. 1989 Mar 30;320(13):822-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198903303201302.
6
A bedside decision instrument to elicit a patient's preference concerning adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.一种用于引出患者对乳腺癌辅助化疗偏好的床边决策工具。
Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jul 1;117(1):53-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-117-1-53.
7
[Management of the axilla in breast cancer: evidences and unresolved issues].[乳腺癌腋窝的管理:证据与未解决的问题]
Orv Hetil. 2001 Sep 9;142(36):1941-50.
8
Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer.一项比较全乳切除术与保乳手术加或不加放疗治疗乳腺癌的随机临床试验12年随访后的重新分析及结果
N Engl J Med. 1995 Nov 30;333(22):1456-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199511303332203.
9
Can women with early-stage breast cancer make an informed decision for mastectomy?早期乳腺癌女性能够做出关于乳房切除术的明智决定吗?
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 1;27(4):519-25. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6215. Epub 2008 Dec 29.
10
Breast irradiation in women with early stage invasive breast cancer following breast conservation surgery. Provincial Breast Disease Site Group.保乳手术后早期浸润性乳腺癌女性的乳房放疗。省级乳腺疾病站点组。
Cancer Prev Control. 1997 Aug;1(3):228-40.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk communication in a patient decision aid for radiotherapy in breast cancer: How to deal with uncertainty?乳腺癌放射治疗患者决策辅助工具中的风险沟通:如何应对不确定性?
Breast. 2020 Jun;51:105-113. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.04.001. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
2
Choosing between conventional and hypofractionated prostate cancer radiation therapy: Results from a study of shared decision-making.在传统与大分割前列腺癌放射治疗之间做出选择:一项共同决策研究的结果
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2020 Mar-Apr;25(2):193-199. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2019.12.028. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
3
What do patients and health care professionals view as important attributes in radiotherapy decisions? Input for a breast cancer patient decision aid.
患者和医疗保健专业人员认为在放疗决策中哪些属性重要?为乳腺癌患者决策辅助工具提供输入。
Breast. 2020 Feb;49:149-156. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.11.005. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
4
A Review of Decision Aids for Patients Considering More Than One Type of Invasive Treatment.考虑多种侵袭性治疗的患者的决策辅助工具综述。
J Surg Res. 2019 Mar;235:350-366. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.017. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
5
Development of an online, patient-centred decision aid for patients with oropharyngeal cancer in the transoral robotic surgery era.在经口机器人手术时代,为口咽癌患者开发一种以患者为中心的在线决策辅助工具。
Curr Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(5):318-323. doi: 10.3747/co.24.3669. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
6
Decision aids for second-line palliative chemotherapy: a randomised phase II multicentre trial.二线姑息性化疗的决策辅助工具:一项随机II期多中心试验。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Aug 31;17(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0529-y.
7
Measuring decision quality: psychometric evaluation of a new instrument for breast cancer chemotherapy.测量决策质量:一种用于乳腺癌化疗的新工具的心理测量学评估
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Aug 20;14:73. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-73.
8
A systematic development process for patient decision aids.患者决策辅助工具的系统开发流程。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S2. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
9
The development of a decision aid to elicit treatment preferences for displaced femoral neck fractures.
Indian J Orthop. 2012 Jan;46(1):22-8. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.91631.
10
Surgical preferences of patients at risk of hip fractures: hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty.髋部骨折风险患者的手术偏好:人工股骨头置换术与全髋关节置换术。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Dec 23;12:289. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-289.