• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

粘结剂厚度对全瓷冠断裂强度的影响。

The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns.

作者信息

Tuntiprawon M, Wilson P R

机构信息

School of Dental Science, University of Melbourne.

出版信息

Aust Dent J. 1995 Feb;40(1):17-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1995.tb05607.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1834-7819.1995.tb05607.x
PMID:7710410
Abstract

The effect of increasing cement thickness on the fracture strength of aluminous porcelain jacket crowns was investigated in this study. Thirty-three aluminous porcelain jacket crowns were divided into three groups. In Group 1, only platinum foil was used to provide cement space. In Group 2 two layers and Group 3 four layers of die spacer were painted onto the metal die before impression taking. Each crown was cemented onto a metal die with zinc phosphate cement and loaded until fracture. The maximum force to break each crown was recorded. The average fracture load was 408 N for Group 1,365 N for Group 2 and 324 N for Group 3. ANOVA (SPSS) found a significant difference (p < 0.05) between groups. A Scheffe Test revealed a significant difference between Groups 1 and 3. It was concluded that increasing the cement thickness above 70 microns reduced the fracture strength of porcelain jacket crowns.

摘要

本研究调查了增加粘结剂厚度对铝瓷全冠断裂强度的影响。33个铝瓷全冠被分为三组。第1组仅使用铂箔来提供粘结剂空间。第2组在取印模前在金属代型上涂两层代型间隙涂料,第3组涂四层。每个全冠用磷酸锌粘固剂粘固到金属代型上并加载直至断裂。记录每个全冠断裂时的最大力。第1组的平均断裂载荷为408 N,第2组为365 N,第3组为324 N。方差分析(SPSS)发现组间存在显著差异(p<0.05)。Scheffe检验显示第1组和第3组之间存在显著差异。得出的结论是,将粘结剂厚度增加到70微米以上会降低瓷全冠的断裂强度。

相似文献

1
The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns.粘结剂厚度对全瓷冠断裂强度的影响。
Aust Dent J. 1995 Feb;40(1):17-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1995.tb05607.x.
2
Fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns with varying core elastic moduli.具有不同核弹性模量的全瓷冠的断裂强度。
Aust Dent J. 2000 Jun;45(2):103-7.
3
In vitro comparison of conventional crowns and a new all-ceramic system.
J Dent. 1993 Feb;21(1):47-51. doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(93)90051-q.
4
Strength and fracture pattern of monolithic CAD/CAM-generated posterior crowns.整体式计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)制作的后牙冠的强度和骨折模式。
Dent Mater. 2006 Jan;22(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.007. Epub 2005 Jul 22.
5
The influence of incisal veneering porcelain thickness of two metal ceramic crown systems on failure resistance after cyclic loading.两种金属烤瓷冠系统切端瓷厚度对循环加载后抗破坏能力的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2010 May;103(5):275-82. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60058-3.
6
The effect of endodontic access preparation on the failure load of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations.根管治疗术预备对锂硅玻璃陶瓷修复体失败负荷的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Nov;106(5):328-36. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60139-X.
7
Seating accuracy and fracture strength of vented and nonvented ceramic crowns luted with three cements.
J Prosthet Dent. 1995 Jul;74(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80223-9.
8
Clinically relevant fracture testing of all-ceramic crowns.全瓷冠的临床相关骨折测试。
Dent Mater. 2013 Aug;29(8):815-23. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.04.026. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
9
In vitro fracture strength of teeth restored with different all-ceramic crown systems.不同全瓷冠系统修复牙齿的体外断裂强度
J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Nov;92(5):491-5. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.09.001.
10
Effects of an internal escape channel on a castable ceramic crown.内部排溢通道对可铸陶瓷冠的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 1991 May;65(5):622-7. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90195-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Lithium disilicate, full coverage crowns: what is the effect of using conventional impressions compared to digital impression with respect to the internal fit of the restoration? A systematic review.二硅酸锂全冠:与数字印模相比,使用传统印模对修复体内部适合性有何影响?一项系统评价。
Evid Based Dent. 2025 Mar;26(1):67. doi: 10.1038/s41432-024-01075-7. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
2
3D-Printed Temporary Wing Bride as a Temporary Restoration in the Posterior.3D打印临时翼状桥体作为后牙区的临时修复体
Case Rep Dent. 2024 May 7;2024:4869352. doi: 10.1155/2024/4869352. eCollection 2024.
3
The influence of pontic distribution on the marginal and internal gaps of CAD/CAM five-unit anterior zirconia framework.
桥体分布对CAD/CAM五单位前牙氧化锆框架边缘和内部间隙的影响
J Dent Sci. 2024 Apr;19(2):1105-1115. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.12.008. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
4
Impact of different CAD software programs on marginal and internal fit of provisional crowns: An in vitro study.不同计算机辅助设计(CAD)软件程序对临时冠边缘及内部适合性的影响:一项体外研究
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 8;10(2):e24205. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24205. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
5
An In Vitro Comparison of Zirconia and Hybrid Ceramic Crowns With Heavy Chamfer and Shoulder Finish Lines.氧化锆与混合陶瓷全冠在重度倒凹和肩台边缘线情况下的体外比较
Cureus. 2023 Jan 18;15(1):e33940. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33940. eCollection 2023 Jan.
6
Accuracy of Additively Manufactured and Milled Interim 3-Unit Fixed Dental Prostheses.增材制造和铣削制作的临时 3 单位固定牙科修复体的准确性。
J Prosthodont. 2022 Mar;31(S1):58-69. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13454.
7
Effect of Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique on the Stress Concentration of Endodontically Treated Upper Central Incisor Restored with Zirconia Crown: 3D-FEA.生物导向性预备技术对上颌中切牙根管治疗后用氧化锆全瓷冠修复后牙体的应力集中影响:三维有限元分析。
Molecules. 2021 Oct 10;26(20):6113. doi: 10.3390/molecules26206113.
8
Assessment of Tooth Preparations Submitted to Dental Laboratories for Fabrication of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns.提交给牙科实验室制作整体式氧化锆全冠的牙齿预备体评估。
Dent J (Basel). 2021 Sep 27;9(10):112. doi: 10.3390/dj9100112.
9
Marginal fit of 3-unit CAD-CAM zirconia frameworks fabricated using cone beam computed tomography scans: an experimental study.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描进行扫描制作的3单位CAD-CAM氧化锆框架的边缘适合性:一项实验研究。
Odontology. 2022 Apr;110(2):339-348. doi: 10.1007/s10266-021-00668-3. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
10
Effect of Die Spacer Thickness on the Microshear Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Veneers.压铸间隔层厚度对CAD/CAM二硅酸锂贴面微剪切粘结强度的影响
Int J Dent. 2021 Jul 23;2021:4593131. doi: 10.1155/2021/4593131. eCollection 2021.