Krause W, Miyazawa T, Uchimoto R, Murayama C, Fritz-Zieroth B, Press W R, Frenzel T
Research Laboratories of Schering Aktiengesellschaft, Berlin, Germany.
Arzneimittelforschung. 1995 Feb;45(2):200-4.
In the present series of studies we investigated differences in vitro and in animal experiments between iopamidol (Iopamiron, CAS 60166-93-0) and ioversol (CAS 87771-40-2). The studies included the in vitro investigations partition coefficient, lysozyme inhibition, coagulation time and erythrocyte morphology as well as the in vivo paradigms acute toxicity, neural toxicity, general behavior/locomotor activity and angiography. Iopamidol was superior to ioversol in most of the tests. In spite of its higher hydrophilicity, ioversol did not show improved tolerance in comparison to iopamidol.
在本系列研究中,我们在体外实验和动物实验中研究了碘帕醇(碘必乐,CAS 60166-93-0)和碘海醇(CAS 87771-40-2)之间的差异。这些研究包括体外研究分配系数、溶菌酶抑制、凝血时间和红细胞形态,以及体内实验范式急性毒性、神经毒性、一般行为/运动活性和血管造影。在大多数测试中,碘帕醇优于碘海醇。尽管碘海醇具有更高的亲水性,但与碘帕醇相比,它并未表现出更好的耐受性。