Mackay T F, Lyman R F, Hill W G
Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695-7614, USA.
Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):849-59. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.849.
A highly inbred strain of Drosophila melanogaster was subdivided into 20 replicate sublines that were maintained independently with 10 pairs of randomly sampled parents per generation for 180 generations. The variance between lines in abdominal and sternopleural bristle number increased little after 100 generations, in contrast to the neutral expectation of a linear increase; and the covariances of line means between different generations declined with increasing number of generations apart, in contrast to the neutral expectation of constant covariance. Thus, under a neutral model, the estimates of mutational variance were lower than for previous estimates from the first 100 generations of subline divergence. An autoregressive model was fitted to the variance of line means that indicated strong natural selection. There is no single unequivocal explanation for the results. Possible and nonexclusive alternatives include stabilizing selection on bristle number and deleterious effects on fitness of bristle mutations. The inferred strengths of selection on both traits are too high for stabilizing selection alone, and the between-line variance did not continue to increase sufficiently for pleiotropy alone to account for the observations. A third potential explanation that does not invoke selection is duplicate epistasis between mutations affecting bristle number.
一个高度近交的黑腹果蝇品系被细分为20个重复亚系,每代通过随机抽取10对亲本独立维持,持续了180代。与线性增加的中性预期相反,腹部和胸部刚毛数量的品系间方差在100代后几乎没有增加;并且不同世代间品系均值的协方差随着世代间隔数的增加而下降,这与协方差恒定的中性预期相反。因此,在中性模型下,突变方差的估计值低于前100代亚系分化的先前估计值。对品系均值的方差拟合了一个自回归模型,表明存在强烈的自然选择。对于这些结果没有单一明确的解释。可能且并非相互排斥的解释包括对刚毛数量的稳定选择以及刚毛突变对适合度的有害影响。仅对于稳定选择而言,推断出的对这两个性状的选择强度过高,并且品系间方差没有持续增加到足以仅由多效性来解释这些观察结果。第三个不涉及选择的潜在解释是影响刚毛数量的突变之间的重复上位性。