• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用兰德36项健康调查评估相对健康计划风险。

Assessing relative health plan risk with the RAND-36 health survey.

作者信息

Hornbrook M C, Goodman M J

机构信息

Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, OR 97227-1098, USA.

出版信息

Inquiry. 1995 Spring;32(1):56-74.

PMID:7713618
Abstract

Unbiased risk assessment models base health plan payments on enrollee health care needs. We explored the risk structure of employed adult health maintenance organization (HMO) members using the RAND-36 health survey. We used multivariate techniques to estimate risk weights on demographic and health status factors. The dependent variable was annual real total health plan expense for covered services for the year following the survey. Repeated random-split-sample validation techniques minimized outlier influences. Five scales improved prediction over simple demographic factors, but demographic factors still were required to achieve unbiased forecasts. Self-reported health status is a useful and powerful risk measure for adults.

摘要

无偏风险评估模型根据参保人的医疗保健需求来确定健康计划支付金额。我们使用兰德36项健康调查对在职成年健康维护组织(HMO)成员的风险结构进行了探究。我们运用多变量技术来估算人口统计学和健康状况因素的风险权重。因变量是调查后一年中所涵盖服务的年度实际健康计划总费用。重复随机分割样本验证技术将异常值的影响降至最低。五个量表比简单的人口统计学因素能更好地进行预测,但仍需要人口统计学因素来实现无偏预测。自我报告的健康状况是成年人一项有用且有力的风险衡量指标。

相似文献

1
Assessing relative health plan risk with the RAND-36 health survey.使用兰德36项健康调查评估相对健康计划风险。
Inquiry. 1995 Spring;32(1):56-74.
2
Chronic disease, functional health status, and demographics: a multi-dimensional approach to risk adjustment.慢性病、功能健康状况与人口统计学:一种风险调整的多维方法。
Health Serv Res. 1996 Aug;31(3):283-307.
3
Demographic risk factors derived from HMO data.
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 1991;12:177-96.
4
Assessing health plan case mix in employed populations: ambulatory morbidity and prescribed drug models.
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 1991;12:197-232.
5
Assessing health plan case mix in employed populations: self-reported health status models.
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 1991;12:233-72.
6
Health risk factor surveys of commercial plan- and Medicaid-enrolled members of health-maintenance organizations--Michigan, 1995.1995年密歇根州健康维护组织商业保险计划参保成员和医疗补助参保成员的健康风险因素调查
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1997 Oct 3;46(39):923-6.
7
A prediction model for targeting low-cost, high-risk members of managed care organizations.一种针对管理式医疗组织中低成本、高风险成员的预测模型。
Am J Manag Care. 2003 May;9(5):381-9.
8
Applications of health risk adjustment: what can be learned from experience to date?
Inquiry. 1998 Summer;35(2):132-47.
9
Some evidence refuting the HMO "favorable selection" hypothesis: the case of Kaiser Permanente.
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 1991;12:19-39.
10
Do HMOs make a difference? Data and methods.健康维护组织(HMOs)有作用吗?数据与方法。
Inquiry. 1999;36(4):378-89.

引用本文的文献

1
Can patient-reported data improve predictions about who will be a high-need, high-cost patient in British Columbia?患者报告的数据能否改善对不列颠哥伦比亚省高需求、高成本患者的预测?
Qual Life Res. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-04008-8.
2
The sensitivity of the MOS SF-12 and PROMIS® global summary scores to adverse health events in an older cohort.MOS SF-12 和 PROMIS® 全球总分对老年队列不良健康事件的敏感性。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Aug;27(8):2207-2215. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1871-y. Epub 2018 May 3.
3
Evaluating Alternative Risk Adjusters for Medicare.
评估医疗保险的替代风险调整器。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1998 Winter;20(2):109-129.
4
Population health needs assessment and healthcare services use in a 3 years follow-up on administrative and clinical data: results from the Brisighella Heart Study.基于行政和临床数据的3年随访中人群健康需求评估及医疗服务利用情况:布里西盖拉心脏研究结果
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2014 Mar;21(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/s40292-013-0033-0. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
5
Single blind randomized phase III trial to investigate the benefit of a focal lesion ablative microboost in prostate cancer (FLAME-trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.单盲随机 III 期临床试验,旨在探究前列腺癌局灶性病变消融微升压的获益(FLAME 试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2011 Dec 5;12:255. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-255.
6
Cost-effectiveness of guided self-help treatment for recurrent binge eating.引导自助治疗复发性暴食症的成本效益。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Jun;78(3):322-33. doi: 10.1037/a0018982.
7
Using information on clinical conditions to predict high-cost patients.利用临床信息预测高费用患者。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;45(2):532-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01080.x. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
8
Estimation of non-response bias in the Medicare FFS HOS.医疗保险按服务项目付费(FFS)家庭健康服务中无应答偏差的估计
Health Care Financ Rev. 2004 Summer;25(4):27-41.
9
Applying a risk-adjustment framework to primary care: can we improve on existing measures?将风险调整框架应用于初级保健:我们能否改进现有措施?
Ann Fam Med. 2003 May-Jun;1(1):44-51. doi: 10.1370/afm.6.
10
Capturing and classifying functional status information in administrative databases.在行政数据库中获取和分类功能状态信息。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2003 Spring;24(3):61-76.