Grayson A S, Weiler E M, Sandman D E
Audiology and Speech Pathology Service VA Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45220.
J Gen Psychol. 1995 Jan;122(1):113-29. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1995.9921226.
Topographical maps of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded from 10 possible Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and 10 control subjects. The purpose of the study was to determine if the two types of VEPs could function as a diagnostic screening for AD. Results of the statistical analysis did not reveal any latency differences between VEPs for the components elicited by either the pattern shift visual evoked potential (PSVEP)--or flash visual evoked potential (FVEP)--elicited components for AD patients compared with the control subjects; however, the information provided insight into results that are frequently lost with conventional evoked potential data. Statistically significant differences in amplitude were found between the P1 and the N2 of the PSVEP at 124, 126, and 130 ms, and at 116 ms for the FVEP.
从10名疑似阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者和10名对照受试者身上记录了视觉诱发电位(VEP)地形图。本研究的目的是确定这两种类型的VEP是否可作为AD的诊断筛查手段。统计分析结果显示,与对照受试者相比,AD患者由模式翻转视觉诱发电位(PSVEP)或闪光视觉诱发电位(FVEP)引出的成分在VEP潜伏期方面没有差异;然而,这些信息为常规诱发电位数据中经常丢失的结果提供了见解。在124、126和130毫秒时,PSVEP的P1和N2之间以及在116毫秒时FVEP的P1和N2之间发现了具有统计学意义的振幅差异。