Suppr超能文献

异氟烷和地氟烷麻醉期间人体压力反射敏感性的比较。

A comparison of baroreflex sensitivity during isoflurane and desflurane anesthesia in humans.

作者信息

Muzi M, Ebert T J

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 1995 Apr;82(4):919-25. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199504000-00015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Desflurane anesthesia has been associated with heart rate (HR) and sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) responses that differ from those during isoflurane anesthesia. Whether these differences might be due to better preservation by desflurane of the baroreceptor reflex control of HR or SNA in humans was examined.

METHODS

Baroreflex sensitivity was assessed in 18 volunteers anesthetized with either desflurane or isoflurane. Measurements of HR, blood pressure (BP), and efferent SNA (percutaneous recordings from the peroneal nerve) were made, and baroreflex sensitivity was evaluated at conscious baseline and during 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 MAC anesthesia. Baroreflex responses were triggered by bolus intravenous injections of nitroprusside (100 micrograms) and phenylephrine (150 micrograms). The linear portions of the baroreflex curves relating HR to mean arterial pressure and relating SNA to diastolic pressure were determined to obtain cardiac and sympathetic baroslopes, respectively.

RESULTS

Cardiac (HR) baroslopes were equally diminished at increasing MAC of both anesthetics. Sympathetic baroslopes were preserved at 0.5 MAC isoflurane but diminished at 0.5 MAC desflurane. Higher MAC produced equal depression of sympathetic baroslopes with both anesthetics.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing MAC of desflurane and isoflurane anesthesia results in similar and progressive decreases in BP but dissimilar SNA and HR responses. These differences are not explained by disparate effects of these anesthetics on the baroreceptor reflex control of SNA or HR.

摘要

背景

地氟烷麻醉与心率(HR)及交感神经活动(SNA)反应相关,这些反应与异氟烷麻醉期间的反应不同。本研究探讨了这些差异是否可能是由于地氟烷对人体压力感受器反射控制HR或SNA的更好保存。

方法

对18名接受地氟烷或异氟烷麻醉的志愿者进行压力反射敏感性评估。测量HR、血压(BP)和传出SNA(腓总神经的经皮记录),并在清醒基线以及0.5、1.0和1.5 MAC麻醉期间评估压力反射敏感性。通过静脉推注硝普钠(100微克)和去氧肾上腺素(150微克)触发压力反射反应。确定将HR与平均动脉压以及将SNA与舒张压相关的压力反射曲线的线性部分,分别获得心脏和交感神经压力斜率。

结果

两种麻醉剂MAC增加时,心脏(HR)压力斜率均同等降低。交感神经压力斜率在0.5 MAC异氟烷时得以保留,但在0.5 MAC地氟烷时降低。更高的MAC对两种麻醉剂的交感神经压力斜率产生同等程度的抑制。

结论

地氟烷和异氟烷麻醉MAC增加导致BP出现相似且渐进性的降低,但SNA和HR反应不同。这些差异不能用地氟烷和异氟烷对SNA或HR的压力感受器反射控制的不同作用来解释。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验