• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[白天开着灯开车?]

[Driving with light during the day?].

作者信息

Lachenmayr B

机构信息

Augenklinik der Universität München.

出版信息

Ophthalmologe. 1995 Feb;92(1):93-9.

PMID:7719085
Abstract

In various Scandinavian countries the use of headlights during daytime (daytime running light DRL) is obligatory since many years. In Canada all new cars have to be equipped with a daytime running light since 1990. Whether or not in Germany or in the southern neighbouring countries a daytime running light should be used is matter of controversial discussion during the least years. Daytime running light increases the visibility of oncoming cars tremendously. Not only the drivers, but also pedestrians and cyclists profit from this gain of visibility. Especially drivers with poor vision, who will become more and more frequent during the coming years due to the increase of percentage of older drivers, have a specific profit from daytime running light. Potentially negative side-effects of daytime running light are: reduction of visibility of the brake-lights, glare, loss of visibility for pedestrians and cyclists, damage to the retina, increase of fuel consumption. All these arguments are either not crucial or cannot be documented by statistical data. On the other hand the data which are available up to now concerning frequency of accidents in those countries and areas in which daytime running light was used or is used, show a trend, sometimes even a statistical significant reduction of daytime accidents. This reduction is especially pronounced for accidents with pedestrians and cyclists. Overall, there are more and better arguments for using daytime running light, also in Germany. A technical alternative would be an automatic switching of the headlights if horizontal illuminance drops below a specific limit, e.g. 2000-3000 lx. Such an automatic procedure would increase the percentage of cars using headlights in critical situations during daytime.

摘要

在斯堪的纳维亚的各个国家,多年来白天使用车头灯(日间行车灯,DRL)是强制性的。自1990年以来,加拿大所有新车都必须配备日间行车灯。在德国或其南部邻国是否应该使用日间行车灯,在过去几年一直是有争议的讨论话题。日间行车灯极大地提高了对向来车的可见度。不仅是司机,行人和骑自行车的人也从这种可见度的提高中受益。特别是视力不好的司机,由于老年司机比例的增加,这类司机在未来几年会越来越多,他们从日间行车灯中获得了特别的益处。日间行车灯潜在的负面影响包括:刹车灯可见度降低、眩光、行人和骑自行车者的可见度丧失、视网膜损伤、油耗增加。所有这些论点要么不关键,要么没有统计数据证明。另一方面,目前关于使用或正在使用日间行车灯的国家和地区事故发生率的数据显示出一种趋势,有时甚至是日间事故在统计上显著减少。这种减少在涉及行人和骑自行车者的事故中尤为明显。总体而言,在德国使用日间行车灯也有更多更好的理由。一种技术替代方案是,如果水平照度降至特定限值以下,例如2000 - 3000勒克斯,车头灯会自动切换。这样的自动程序将增加白天在关键情况下使用车头灯的汽车比例。

相似文献

1
[Driving with light during the day?].[白天开着灯开车?]
Ophthalmologe. 1995 Feb;92(1):93-9.
2
[Daytime running light: pros and cons].[日间行车灯:利弊]
Ophthalmologe. 2003 Oct;100(10):836-42. doi: 10.1007/s00347-002-0755-1.
3
The prospects of daytime running lights for reducing vehicle crashes in the United States.日间行车灯在美国减少车辆碰撞事故方面的前景。
Public Health Rep. 1995 May-Jun;110(3):233-9.
4
The effect of lighting conditions and use of headlights on drivers' perception and appraisal of approaching vehicles at junctions.照明条件和前大灯使用对驾驶员在交叉口感知和评价接近车辆的影响。
Ergonomics. 2018 Mar;61(3):444-455. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1364790. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
5
Influence of daytime running lamps on visual reaction time of pedestrians when detecting turn indicators.日间行车灯对行人检测转弯指示灯时视觉反应时间的影响。
J Safety Res. 2010 Oct;41(5):385-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2010.03.007. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
6
Are car daytime running lights detrimental to motorcycle conspicuity?汽车日间行车灯对摩托车可视性是否有害?
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Nov;49:78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.09.013. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
7
Can a road safety measure be both effective and ineffective at the same time? A game-theoretic model of the effects of daytime running lights.道路安全措施能同时既有效又无效吗?日间行车灯效果的博弈论模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Oct;59:394-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.039. Epub 2013 Jul 6.
8
The prevalence and reliability of visibility aid and other risk factor data for uninjured cyclists and pedestrians in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.加拿大艾伯塔省埃德蒙顿市未受伤骑自行车者和行人的可见性辅助工具及其他风险因素数据的患病率和可靠性。
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Mar;39(2):284-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.07.010. Epub 2006 Oct 4.
9
A meta-analysis of studies concerning the safety effects of daytime running lights on cars.
Accid Anal Prev. 1996 Nov;28(6):685-94. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(96)00041-3.
10
The influence of perceptual 'set' on the detection of motorcyclists using daytime headlights.
Ergonomics. 1995 Jul;38(7):1326-41. doi: 10.1080/00140139508925191.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
[Daytime running light: pros and cons].[日间行车灯:利弊]
Ophthalmologe. 2003 Oct;100(10):836-42. doi: 10.1007/s00347-002-0755-1.