• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设计医学信息学研究和图书馆资源项目以增加所学到的知识。

Designing medical informatics research and library--resource projects to increase what is learned.

作者信息

Stead W W, Haynes R B, Fuller S, Friedman C P, Travis L E, Beck J R, Fenichel C H, Chandrasekaran B, Buchanan B G, Abola E E

机构信息

Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994 Jan-Feb;1(1):28-33. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1994.95236134.

DOI:10.1136/jamia.1994.95236134
PMID:7719785
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC116182/
Abstract

Careful study of medical informatics research and library-resource projects is necessary to increase the productivity of the research and development enterprise. Medical informatics research projects can present unique problems with respect to evaluation. It is not always possible to adapt directly the evaluation methods that are commonly employed in the natural and social sciences. Problems in evaluating medical informatics projects may be overcome by formulating system development work in terms of a testable hypothesis; subdividing complex projects into modules, each of which can be developed, tested and evaluated rigorously; and utilizing qualitative studies in situations where more definitive quantitative studies are impractical.

摘要

仔细研究医学信息学研究和图书馆资源项目对于提高研发企业的生产力是必要的。医学信息学研究项目在评估方面可能会出现独特的问题。直接采用自然科学和社会科学中常用的评估方法并不总是可行的。评估医学信息学项目中的问题可以通过以下方式克服:根据可检验的假设来制定系统开发工作;将复杂项目细分为各个模块,每个模块都可以进行严格的开发、测试和评估;以及在更明确的定量研究不切实际的情况下利用定性研究。

相似文献

1
Designing medical informatics research and library--resource projects to increase what is learned.设计医学信息学研究和图书馆资源项目以增加所学到的知识。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994 Jan-Feb;1(1):28-33. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1994.95236134.
2
Medical informatics conference papers: a content analysis of research in a new discipline.
Comput Biomed Res. 1994 Aug;27(4):276-90. doi: 10.1006/cbmr.1994.1022.
3
Show me the money: funding informatics research.资金在哪里:资助信息学研究。
MD Comput. 1999 Jul-Aug;16(4):17-20.
4
Medical Informatics Education & Research in Greece.希腊的医学信息学教育与研究。
Yearb Med Inform. 2015 Aug 13;10(1):220-6. doi: 10.15265/IY-2015-022. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
5
A quantitative ranking of the Biomedical Informatics serials.生物医学信息学期刊的定量排名。
Methods Inf Med. 1995 Sep;34(4):397-40.
6
Citation analysis in journal rankings: medical informatics in the library and information science literature.期刊排名中的引文分析:图书馆与信息科学文献中的医学信息学
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1998 Oct;86(4):518-22.
7
Defining and assessing medical informatics competencies.定义和评估医学信息学能力。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2005 Summer;24(2):95-102. doi: 10.1300/J115v24n02_08.
8
Leveraging change to integrate library and informatics competencies into a new CTSC curriculum: a program evaluation.利用变革将图书馆与信息学能力融入新的临床与转化科学中心课程:一项项目评估
Med Ref Serv Q. 2009 Jul;28(3):221-34. doi: 10.1080/02763860903069888.
9
The quality of reporting of health informatics evaluation studies: a pilot study.健康信息学评估研究的报告质量:一项试点研究。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 1):193-7.
10
The use and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies in medical informatics.准实验研究在医学信息学中的应用与解读。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Jan-Feb;13(1):16-23. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1749. Epub 2005 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging the Gap: Challenges and Strategies for the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems in Clinical Practice.弥合差距:基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统在临床实践中实施的挑战与策略
Yearb Med Inform. 2024 Aug;33(1):103-114. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1800729. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
2
AI Applications for Chronic Condition Self-Management: Scoping Review.人工智能在慢性病自我管理中的应用:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 8;27:e59632. doi: 10.2196/59632.
3
Principles and implementation strategies for equitable and representative academic partnerships in global health informatics research.全球卫生信息学研究中公平且具代表性的学术伙伴关系的原则与实施策略
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 May 1;32(5):958-963. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf015.
4
Realizing the Full Potential of Clinical Decision Support: Translating Usability Testing into Routine Practice in Health Care Operations.实现临床决策支持的全部潜力:将可用性测试转化为医疗保健运营中的常规实践。
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Oct;15(5):1039-1048. doi: 10.1055/a-2404-2129. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
5
Development of a novel instrument to characterize telemedicine programs in primary care.开发一种新工具,以描述初级保健中的远程医疗计划。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 17;23(1):1274. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10130-5.
6
Systematic review and longitudinal analysis of implementing Artificial Intelligence to predict clinical deterioration in adult hospitals: what is known and what remains uncertain.系统评价和纵向分析在成人医院实施人工智能预测临床恶化:已知和未知。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Jan 18;31(2):509-524. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad220.
7
Perspectives on implementing models for decision support in clinical care.临床护理中实施决策支持模型的观点。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Aug 18;30(9):1463-1464. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad142.
8
Triage and Diagnostic Accuracy of Online Symptom Checkers: Systematic Review.在线症状检查器的分诊和诊断准确性:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 2;25:e43803. doi: 10.2196/43803.
9
Implementation frameworks for end-to-end clinical AI: derivation of the SALIENT framework.端到端临床人工智能实施框架:SALIENT 框架的推导。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Aug 18;30(9):1503-1515. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad088.
10
Deployment of machine learning algorithms to predict sepsis: systematic review and application of the SALIENT clinical AI implementation framework.部署机器学习算法预测脓毒症:SALIENT 临床人工智能实施框架的系统评价与应用。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Jun 20;30(7):1349-1361. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad075.

本文引用的文献

1
Preparing a medical informatics research grant proposal: general principles.撰写医学信息学研究资助提案:一般原则
Comput Biomed Res. 1989 Feb;22(1):92-101. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(89)90018-9.