Suppr超能文献

商用花生皮试提取物的比较。

Comparison of commercial peanut skin test extracts.

作者信息

Hefle S L, Helm R M, Burks A W, Bush R K

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1995 Apr;95(4):837-42. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(95)70127-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Skin prick testing is a major tool for diagnosing food allergy. Food allergen extracts have not been standardized; this may lead to great variability in the predictive accuracy of skin prick tests.

METHODS

Six commercial peanut skin test extracts were compared in vitro with RAST inhibition assays, ELISA, and sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) followed by immunoblotting with sera from peanut-allergic adults and in vivo by skin prick testing.

RESULTS

ELISA showed that the content of peanut allergens Ara h I and Ara h II in the extracts ranged from 0.0015 to 0.0236 and 0.0001 to 0.0164 mg Eq/ml, respectively. RAST inhibition studies showed that the extracts produced curves of similar slope, suggesting conservation of allergenic epitopes. SDS-PAGE revealed differences in protein profiles because roasted extracts generally possessed the same number and proportion of major protein bands but raw extracts varied more in both respects. SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting showed that two of the extracts contained major IgE-binding protein bands that did not appear in the others. One roasted extract gave little protein banding and consequently little IgE binding.

CONCLUSIONS

Skin testing results showed no differences in the ability of the extracts to provoke a positive skin test response in peanut-sensitive subjects.

摘要

背景

皮肤点刺试验是诊断食物过敏的主要手段。食物过敏原提取物尚未标准化,这可能导致皮肤点刺试验的预测准确性存在很大差异。

方法

采用放射性变应原吸附抑制试验(RAST抑制试验)、酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和十二烷基硫酸钠-聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(SDS-PAGE),继以花生过敏成人血清免疫印迹法,对6种市售花生皮肤试验提取物进行体外比较,并通过皮肤点刺试验进行体内比较。

结果

ELISA显示,提取物中花生过敏原Ara h I和Ara h II的含量分别为0.0015至0.0236和0.0001至0.0164毫克当量/毫升。RAST抑制研究表明,提取物产生的曲线斜率相似,提示过敏原表位保守。SDS-PAGE显示蛋白质图谱存在差异,因为烘焙提取物通常具有相同数量和比例的主要蛋白条带,但生提取物在这两方面变化更大。SDS-PAGE和免疫印迹显示,其中两种提取物含有其他提取物中未出现的主要IgE结合蛋白条带。一种烘焙提取物蛋白条带很少,因此IgE结合也很少。

结论

皮肤试验结果显示,提取物在花生敏感受试者中引发阳性皮肤试验反应的能力没有差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验