• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性自我毁灭与自我挫败型人格:异同之处

Chronic self-destructiveness and self-defeating personality: similarities and differences.

作者信息

Sharp M, Schill T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale 62901, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1995 Apr;64(2):270-8. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6402_7.

DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa6402_7
PMID:7722853
Abstract

This study attempts to determine whether the Chronic Self-Destructiveness Scale (CSDS; Kelley, Byrne, et al., 1985) would be better described as a measure of impulsiveness or self-defeating behavior in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed., Rev. [DSM-III-R]; American Psychiatric Association, 1987) diagnostic sense. Subjects completed the CSDS, the Self-Defeating Scale (Schill, 1990), and measures of restraint, distress, and psychopathy. Based on the correlations among these scales, we suggest that the CSDS is better described as a measure of impulsiveness, poor judgment, and immediate gratification, rather than a measure of Self-Defeating Personality, which keeps the individual in a victim position.

摘要

本研究试图确定《慢性自我毁灭量表》(CSDS;凯利、伯恩等人,1985年)是否更宜被描述为《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第3版,修订版[DSM-III-R];美国精神病学协会,1987年)诊断意义上的冲动性或自我挫败行为的一种测量工具。受试者完成了CSDS、自我挫败量表(希尔,1990年)以及关于克制、痛苦和精神病态的测量。基于这些量表之间的相关性,我们认为CSDS更宜被描述为一种冲动性、判断力差和即时满足感的测量工具,而非一种将个体置于受害者地位的自我挫败型人格的测量工具。

相似文献

1
Chronic self-destructiveness and self-defeating personality: similarities and differences.慢性自我毁灭与自我挫败型人格:异同之处
J Pers Assess. 1995 Apr;64(2):270-8. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6402_7.
2
Ethical aspects of personality disorders.人格障碍的伦理方面。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2010 Nov;23(6):546-9. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32833e040d.
3
Impulsive phenomena, the impulsive character (der Triebhafte Charakter) and DSM personality disorders.冲动现象、冲动性格(der Triebhafte Charakter)与 DSM 人格障碍。
J Pers Disord. 2011 Oct;25(5):586-606. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.5.586.
4
Is the appendix a useful appendage? An empirical examination of depressive, passive-aggressive (negativistic), sadistic, and self-defeating personality disorders.阑尾是一个有用的附属器官吗?对抑郁型、被动攻击型(消极型)、施虐型和自我挫败型人格障碍的实证研究。
J Pers Disord. 2006 Oct;20(5):524-40. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2006.20.5.524.
5
A five-factor model perspective on psychopathy and comorbid Axis-II disorders in a forensic-psychiatric sample.从五因素模型角度看法医精神病学样本中的精神病态与共病的轴II障碍
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2008 Oct-Nov;31(5):394-406. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.08.008. Epub 2008 Sep 13.
6
Object relations, defensive operations, and affective states in narcissistic, borderline, and antisocial personality disorder.自恋型、边缘型和反社会型人格障碍中的客体关系、防御机制及情感状态
J Pers Assess. 1992 Aug;59(1):32-49. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5901_4.
7
Relationship between clinician assessment and self-assessment of personality disorders using the SWAP-200 and PAI.使用SWAP-200和PAI对人格障碍进行临床医生评估与自我评估之间的关系。
Psychol Assess. 2007 Jun;19(2):225-9. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.2.225.
8
Psychopathy and the Five-factor model of personality: a replication and extension.心理变态与人格五因素模型:一项重复与扩展研究
J Pers Assess. 2003 Oct;81(2):168-78. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8102_08.
9
Identifying subtypes among offenders with antisocial personality disorder: a cluster-analytic study.识别具有反社会人格障碍的罪犯亚类:一项聚类分析研究。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2010 May;119(2):389-400. doi: 10.1037/a0018611.
10
[Validation of the French translation of the impulsive nonconformity scale].[冲动性非从众量表法语翻译的验证]
Encephale. 2008 Dec;34(6):563-9. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.08.010. Epub 2008 Feb 20.