• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与无脂和常规脂肪食品相关期望的前因和后果。

Antecedents and consequences of expectations related to fat-free and regular-fat foods.

作者信息

Tuorila H, Cardello A V, Lesher L L

机构信息

US Army Natick Research, Development and Engineering Center, USA.

出版信息

Appetite. 1994 Dec;23(3):247-63. doi: 10.1006/appe.1994.1057.

DOI:10.1006/appe.1994.1057
PMID:7726543
Abstract

Hedonic and sensory expectations related to fat-free and regular-fat pound cake, crackers and American cheese were studied with 97 subjects divided into three subgroups, each testing one type of product. Four study phases were separated by 1-month intervals: (1) a questionnaire on demographics, dietary practices and consumption of the test products, (2) intensity ratings of sensory attributes and ratings of liking of unlabeled fat-free and regular-fat samples, (3) ratings of expected attribute intensities and liking in response to product labels of "fat-free" and "regular", and subsequent ratings of these samples and (4) phase 3 repeated with opposite (incorrect) labels. Fat-free products were expected to be less liked than their regular counterparts; however, only cheese was less liked in actual taste tests. Expected liking was best predicted by familiarity with the product and, in the case of fat-free products, by the extent to which a person substituted low-fat for high-fat foods. Actual liking was best predicted by the effect of labeling and by expectations. The expected intensities of sensory attributes were uniformly higher in regular than in fat-free products. Both sensory and hedonic ratings of labeled samples changed in the direction of expectations, as compared to baseline values, supporting an assimilation model of the effect of disconfirmed expectations on sensory perception and consumer acceptance.

摘要

对97名受试者进行了研究,探讨了与无脂和常规脂肪磅蛋糕、饼干及美式奶酪相关的享乐期望和感官期望。受试者被分为三个亚组,每组测试一种产品。四个研究阶段间隔1个月:(1)关于人口统计学、饮食习惯和测试产品消费情况的问卷调查;(2)对无标签的无脂和常规脂肪样品的感官属性强度评分及喜好程度评分;(3)对“无脂”和“常规”产品标签下预期属性强度和喜好程度的评分,以及随后对这些样品的评分;(4)用相反(错误)标签重复阶段3。预计无脂产品的受欢迎程度低于其常规同类产品;然而,在实际口味测试中,只有奶酪的受欢迎程度较低。对产品的熟悉程度以及(对于无脂产品而言)个人用低脂食品替代高脂食品的程度,最能预测预期的喜好程度。标签的影响和预期最能预测实际的喜好程度。常规产品的感官属性预期强度普遍高于无脂产品。与基线值相比,贴有标签样品的感官评分和享乐评分均朝着预期方向变化,这支持了关于未证实期望对感官感知和消费者接受度影响的同化模型。

相似文献

1
Antecedents and consequences of expectations related to fat-free and regular-fat foods.与无脂和常规脂肪食品相关期望的前因和后果。
Appetite. 1994 Dec;23(3):247-63. doi: 10.1006/appe.1994.1057.
2
The choice of fat-free vs. regular-fat fudge: the effects of liking for the alternative and the restraint status.无脂软糖与常规脂肪软糖的选择:对替代物的喜好以及克制状态的影响。
Appetite. 2001 Aug;37(1):27-32. doi: 10.1006/appe.2001.0410.
3
Effect of reduced-fat information on expected and actual hedonic and sensory ratings of sausage.
Appetite. 1998 Feb;30(1):13-23. doi: 10.1006/appe.1997.0104.
4
Acceptance and purchase intent of US consumers for nonwheat rice butter cakes.美国消费者对非小麦米黄油蛋糕的接受度和购买意愿。
J Food Sci. 2007 Mar;72(2):S92-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00256.x.
5
Liking and exposure: first, second and tenth time around.喜好与接触:初次、再次及第十次接触。
Physiol Behav. 2006 Aug 30;89(1):47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.01.036. Epub 2006 Mar 6.
6
Influences of food-name labels on perceived tastes.食物名称标签对味觉感知的影响。
Chem Senses. 2009 Mar;34(3):187-94. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjn075. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
7
Individual astringency responsiveness affects the acceptance of phenol-rich foods.个体涩味感受性影响富含酚类食物的接受度。
Appetite. 2011 Jun;56(3):633-42. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.02.017. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
8
Cheese acceptance and dairy product consumption in an older population.老年人群对奶酪的接受度及乳制品消费情况
J Nutr Elder. 1993;13(1):23-36. doi: 10.1300/J052v13n01_03.
9
Influence of relative fat content information on responses to three foods.相对脂肪含量信息对三种食物反应的影响。
Appetite. 1997 Feb;28(1):49-62. doi: 10.1006/appe.1996.0066.
10
Self-prediction of hedonic trajectories for repeated use of body products and foods: poor performance, not improved by a full generation of experience.对身体护理产品和食物重复使用的享乐轨迹进行自我预测:表现不佳,即便经过整整一代人的体验也未得到改善。
Appetite. 2006 May;46(3):297-303. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.01.016. Epub 2006 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Does the label 'unconventional food plant' influence food acceptance by potential consumers? A first approach.“非常规食用植物”这一标签会影响潜在消费者对食品的接受度吗?初步探讨。
Heliyon. 2021 Apr 8;7(4):e06731. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06731. eCollection 2021 Apr.
2
Can eating pleasure be a lever for healthy eating? A systematic scoping review of eating pleasure and its links with dietary behaviors and health.饮食愉悦感能否成为健康饮食的杠杆?饮食愉悦感及其与饮食行为和健康关系的系统范围评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 21;15(12):e0244292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244292. eCollection 2020.
3
Fats are Glossy but Does Glossiness Imply Fatness? The Influence of Packaging Glossiness on Food Perceptions.
脂肪是有光泽的,但有光泽就意味着是脂肪吗?包装光泽度对食物认知的影响。
Foods. 2020 Jan 15;9(1):90. doi: 10.3390/foods9010090.
4
Impact of Common Food Labels on Consumer Liking in Vanilla Yogurt.常见食品标签对消费者对香草酸奶喜好度的影响。
Foods. 2019 Nov 17;8(11):584. doi: 10.3390/foods8110584.
5
How Strong Is Your Coffee? The Influence of Visual Metaphors and Textual Claims on Consumers' Flavor Perception and Product Evaluation.你的咖啡有多浓?视觉隐喻和文字描述对消费者风味感知及产品评价的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 5;9:53. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00053. eCollection 2018.
6
Limbic activation to novel versus familiar food cues predicts food preference and alcohol intake.对新的与熟悉的食物线索的边缘激活预测食物偏好和酒精摄入量。
Brain Res. 2013 May 28;1512:37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
7
Identification of gustatory-olfactory flavor mixtures: effects of linguistic labeling.味觉-嗅觉混合气味的识别:语言标签的影响。
Chem Senses. 2013 May;38(4):305-13. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjs142. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
8
Olfactory imagery: a review.嗅觉意象:综述
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Apr;12(2):244-64. doi: 10.3758/bf03196369.