Takeda W, Wessel J
Arthritis Care Res. 1994 Sep;7(3):118-22. doi: 10.1002/art.1790070304.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether acupuncture was more effective than sham acupuncture in the reduction of pain in persons with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee.
Forty subjects (20 men, 20 women) with radiographic evidence of OA of the knee were stratified by gender and randomly assigned to either the experimental (real acupuncture) or control (sham acupuncture) groups. Subjects were treated three times per week for 3 weeks and evaluated at three test sessions. Outcome measures were: 1) the Pain Rating Index of the McGill Pain Questionnaire, 2) the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index, and 3) pain threshold at four sites at the knee.
The analyses of variance showed that both real and sham acupuncture significantly reduced pain, stiffness, and physical disability in the OA knee, but that there were no significant differences between groups.
Acupuncture is not more effective than sham acupuncture in the treatment of OA pain.
本研究旨在确定针刺疗法在减轻膝骨关节炎(OA)患者疼痛方面是否比假针刺疗法更有效。
40名有膝关节OA影像学证据的受试者(20名男性,20名女性)按性别分层,随机分为实验组(真针刺)或对照组(假针刺)。受试者每周接受3次治疗,共3周,并在三个测试阶段进行评估。结果指标为:1)麦吉尔疼痛问卷的疼痛评分指数,2)西安大略和麦克马斯特大学(WOMAC)骨关节炎指数,以及3)膝关节四个部位的疼痛阈值。
方差分析表明,真针刺和假针刺均能显著减轻OA膝关节的疼痛、僵硬和身体残疾,但两组之间无显著差异。
在治疗OA疼痛方面,针刺疗法并不比假针刺疗法更有效。