The rhetoric of research.
作者信息
Horton R
出版信息
BMJ. 1995 Apr 15;310(6985):985-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6985.985.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The rhetoric of research.研究的言辞
BMJ. 1995 Apr 15;310(6985):985-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6985.985.
2
Writing for readers.为读者而写作。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003 Oct;29(8):633. doi: 10.1016/s0748-7983(03)00144-6.
3
Quantitative influences on the presentation of qualitative articles.
Qual Health Res. 2007 Feb;17(2):147-8. doi: 10.1177/1049732306297321.
4
Writing style.写作风格。
J Clin Nurs. 2001 Jul;10(4):417-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2001.00507.x.
5
Thirty-Three Years of Dizzy Medical Writing and Editing: A Meta-Analysis and the Hall of Shame.三十三年的眩晕医学写作与编辑：一项荟萃分析与耻辱殿堂
Tex Heart Inst J. 2016 Oct 1;43(5):376-380. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-16-5870. eCollection 2016 Oct.
6
Words: their meanings and implications.词汇：它们的含义及影响。
J Allied Health. 2011 Spring;40(1):1.
7
Regional associations of medical journal editors: moving from rhetoric to reality.医学期刊编辑区域协会：从言辞走向现实
Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Jun;83(6):404. Epub 2005 Jun 17.
8
The rhetoric of research. Encourage spin: it provides context.研究的言辞。鼓励夸大其词：它能提供背景信息。
BMJ. 1995 Jul 1;311(6996):61. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6996.61a.
9
Three grammar problems found by reviewers.审稿人发现了三个语法问题。
Nurse Author Ed. 2003 Winter;13(1):7-8.
10
[Specific features of written medical English language].[医学英语书面语的具体特征]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2010 Sep-Oct;138(9-10):668-73.
引用本文的文献
1
[Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration - a Korean translation].[加强流行病学观察性研究报告（STROBE）：解释与详述——韩文译本]
Ewha Med J. 2024 Apr;47(2):e31. doi: 10.12771/emj.2024.e31. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
2
Spin Bias in randomized controlled trials of botulinum toxin for bruxism management: a meta-epidemiologic study.肉毒杆菌毒素治疗磨牙症的随机对照试验中的发表偏倚：一项元流行病学研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 May 8;25(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02547-9.
3
CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials.CONSORT 2025解释与阐述：随机对照试验报告的更新指南
BMJ. 2025 Apr 14;389:e081124. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081124.
4
Spin in dental publications: a scoping review.牙科出版物中的“自旋”：一项范围综述。
Braz Oral Res. 2024 Jul 12;38:e065. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0065. eCollection 2024.
5
The analysis of living systems can generate both knowledge and illusions.对生命系统的分析既能产生知识，也能产生幻象。
Elife. 2020 Jun 18;9:e56354. doi: 10.7554/eLife.56354.
6
Spin in the reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation of adverse effects of orthodontic interventions: protocol for a cross-sectional study of systematic reviews.正畸干预不良反应报告、解读及外推中的偏差：一项系统评价横断面研究的方案
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019 Dec 19;4:27. doi: 10.1186/s41073-019-0084-4. eCollection 2019.
7
Trial registration as a safeguard against outcome reporting bias and spin? A case study of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture.注册临床试验以防止结果报告偏倚和歪曲？一项针灸随机对照试验的案例研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 3;14(10):e0223305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223305. eCollection 2019.
8
Occurrence and nature of questionable research practices in the reporting of messages and conclusions in international scientific Health Services Research publications: a structured assessment of publications authored by researchers in the Netherlands.国际卫生服务研究出版物中报告信息和结论的可疑研究行为的发生情况和性质：对荷兰研究人员撰写的出版物进行的结构化评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 15;9(5):e027903. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027903.
9
Level and Prevalence of Spin in Published Cardiovascular Randomized Clinical Trial Reports With Statistically Nonsignificant Primary Outcomes: A Systematic Review.发表的心血管随机临床试验报告中具有统计学无显著性主要结局的旋转水平和流行率：系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e192622. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2622.
10
Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature.生物医学文献中的研究结果的伪造和歪曲。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2613-2619. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1710755115.
Zotero 插件