Sawyer D M, Williams J R
Department of Pathology, Red Deer Regional Hospital Centre, Alta.
CMAJ. 1995 May 1;152(9):1409-11.
The CMA's Working Group on Core and Comprehensive Health Care Services recognizes ethics to be one of the three key factors in determining which services should be publicly funded. The role of ethics is to identify and make explicit the principles and values, at individual and societal levels, that lie behind judgements and positions. Two types of ethical issues are addressed: one deals with the criteria for these services and the other with the process to be followed. The five ethical criteria discussed are fairness, age, lifestyle, the identifiable versus the statistical patient, and futility. An ethical process incorporates appropriate roles for the public physicians and payers (government) and accountability of all participants. A provided checklist for determining a fair process asks such questions as Do potential users of a service, its providers and the public have an adequate say in the decision about whether the service should be publicly funded? Are the reasons for the decision communicated to those affected by it? and is the service being denied to potential users on the basis of unfair discrimination or lifestyle?
加拿大医学协会核心与综合医疗服务工作组认为,伦理是决定哪些服务应由公共资金资助的三个关键因素之一。伦理的作用是在个人和社会层面识别并明确判断和立场背后的原则和价值观。讨论了两类伦理问题:一类涉及这些服务的标准,另一类涉及应遵循的程序。所讨论的五个伦理标准是公平、年龄、生活方式、可识别患者与统计意义上的患者,以及无用性。一个符合伦理的程序包括公共医生和付款方(政府)的适当角色以及所有参与者的问责制。一份用于确定公平程序的检查表提出了诸如以下问题:一项服务的潜在使用者、其提供者和公众在关于该服务是否应由公共资金资助的决策中是否有充分的发言权?决策理由是否传达给受其影响的人?以及该服务是否因不公平歧视或生活方式而被潜在使用者拒绝?