Wilson R, Rowan M S, Henderson J
Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.
CMAJ. 1995 Apr 1;152(7):1063-6.
The CMA's decision-making framework on core (i.e., publicly funded) and comprehensive health care services emphasizes flexibility and recognizes three levels at which decisions can be made: between patients and physicians (micro), in the community or by society (meso) and by governments (macro). Three major content dimensions are considered quality of care (e.g., effectiveness, appropriateness and efficiency of health care services), ethics (e.g., decisions that reflect fairness and acceptability to patients and physicians) and economics (e.g., measurement of service costs against economic benefits in a time of severe economic restraint). There are challenges in applying the framework; however, by providing decision-makers with the knowledge and tools needed to assist in the process, it is hoped that the first and foremost concern will continue to be the quality of patient care so highly valued by Canadians.
加拿大医学会关于核心(即公共资助)和全面医疗服务的决策框架强调灵活性,并认识到可以做出决策的三个层面:患者与医生之间(微观层面)、社区或社会层面(中观层面)以及政府层面(宏观层面)。三个主要内容维度包括医疗质量(如医疗服务的有效性、适宜性和效率)、伦理(如反映公平性以及患者和医生可接受性的决策)和经济学(如在经济严重受限时期衡量服务成本与经济效益)。应用该框架存在挑战;然而,通过为决策者提供协助这一过程所需的知识和工具,人们希望首要关注点将继续是加拿大人高度重视的患者护理质量。