• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病初级护理患者的护士协调干预措施:对血糖控制及健康相关生活质量的影响。

A nurse-coordinated intervention for primary care patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: impact on glycemic control and health-related quality of life.

作者信息

Weinberger M, Kirkman M S, Samsa G P, Shortliffe E A, Landsman P B, Cowper P A, Simel D L, Feussner J R

机构信息

Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VAMC, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Feb;10(2):59-66. doi: 10.1007/BF02600227.

DOI:10.1007/BF02600227
PMID:7730940
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of a nurse-coordinated intervention delivered to patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus between office visits to primary care physicians.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

Veterans Affairs general medical clinic.

PATIENTS

275 veterans who had NIDDM and were receiving primary care from general internists.

INTERVENTION

Nurse-initiated contacts were made by telephone at least monthly to provide patient education (with special emphasis on regimens and significant signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia), reinforce compliance with regimens, monitor patients' health status, facilitate resolution of identified problems, and facilitate access to primary care.

MEASUREMENTS

Glycemic control was assessed using glycosylated hemoglobin (GHb) and fasting blood sugar (FBS) levels. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was measured with the Medical Outcomes Study SF-36, and diabetes-related symptoms were assessed using patients' self-reports of signs and symptoms of hyper- and hypoglycemia during the previous month.

MAIN RESULTS

At one year, between-group differences favored intervention patients for FBS (174.1 mg/dL vs 193.1 mg/dL, p = 0.011) and GHb (10.5% vs 11.1%, p = 0.046). Statistically significant differences were not observed for either SF-36 scores (p = 0.66) or diabetes-related symptoms (p = 0.23).

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention, designed to be a pragmatic, low-intensity adjunct to care delivered by physicians, modestly improved glycemic control but not HRQOL or diabetes-related symptoms.

摘要

目的

研究在非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者两次就诊于初级保健医生期间,由护士协调实施的干预措施所产生的影响。

设计

随机对照试验。

地点

退伍军人事务部综合医疗诊所。

患者

275名患有非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病且接受普通内科医生初级保健的退伍军人。

干预措施

护士至少每月通过电话与患者联系,提供患者教育(特别强调治疗方案以及高血糖和低血糖的重要体征和症状),强化对治疗方案的依从性,监测患者的健康状况,促进解决已发现的问题,并便利患者获得初级保健服务。

测量指标

使用糖化血红蛋白(GHb)和空腹血糖(FBS)水平评估血糖控制情况。采用医学结局研究简表36(Medical Outcomes Study SF-36)测量健康相关生活质量(HRQOL),并通过患者对前一个月高血糖和低血糖体征及症状的自我报告评估糖尿病相关症状。

主要结果

在一年时,组间差异显示干预组患者的空腹血糖(174.1毫克/分升对193.1毫克/分升,p = 0.011)和糖化血红蛋白(10.5%对11.1%,p = 0.046)更优。在简表36评分(p = 0.66)或糖尿病相关症状(p = 0.23)方面未观察到统计学上的显著差异。

结论

该干预措施旨在作为医生所提供治疗的实用、低强度辅助手段,适度改善了血糖控制,但未改善健康相关生活质量或糖尿病相关症状。

相似文献

1
A nurse-coordinated intervention for primary care patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: impact on glycemic control and health-related quality of life.一项针对非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病初级护理患者的护士协调干预措施:对血糖控制及健康相关生活质量的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Feb;10(2):59-66. doi: 10.1007/BF02600227.
2
The relationship between glycemic control and health-related quality of life in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者血糖控制与健康相关生活质量的关系。
Med Care. 1994 Dec;32(12):1173-81. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199412000-00002.
3
Impact of automated calls with nurse follow-up on diabetes treatment outcomes in a Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System: a randomized controlled trial.退伍军人事务部医疗保健系统中护士随访自动呼叫对糖尿病治疗结果的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Diabetes Care. 2001 Feb;24(2):202-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.2.202.
4
Nurse case management to improve glycemic control in diabetic patients in a health maintenance organization. A randomized, controlled trial.在健康维护组织中,护士病例管理对改善糖尿病患者血糖控制的效果。一项随机对照试验。
Ann Intern Med. 1998 Oct 15;129(8):605-12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-129-8-199810150-00004.
5
The impact of a daily smartphone-based feedback system among women with gestational diabetes on compliance, glycemic control, satisfaction, and pregnancy outcome: a randomized controlled trial.基于智能手机的日常反馈系统对妊娠期糖尿病女性的依从性、血糖控制、满意度和妊娠结局的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;218(4):453.e1-453.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.044. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
6
A clinical trial of chronic care diabetic clinics in general practice in the United Arab Emirates: a preliminary analysis.阿拉伯联合酋长国初级医疗中慢性护理糖尿病诊所的一项临床试验:初步分析。
Arch Physiol Biochem. 2001 Jul;109(3):272-80. doi: 10.1076/apab.109.3.272.11591.
7
The effect of automated calls with telephone nurse follow-up on patient-centered outcomes of diabetes care: a randomized, controlled trial.电话护士随访自动呼叫对糖尿病护理以患者为中心结局的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Med Care. 2000 Feb;38(2):218-30. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200002000-00011.
8
Randomized controlled trial of a family-oriented self-management program to improve self-efficacy, glycemic control and quality of life among Thai individuals with Type 2 diabetes.一项以家庭为导向的自我管理项目改善泰国2型糖尿病患者自我效能、血糖控制及生活质量的随机对照试验。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Jan;123:37-48. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.11.013. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
9
Design and implementation of an Omaha System-based integrated nursing management model for patients with newly-diagnosed diabetes.基于奥马哈系统的新诊断糖尿病患者综合护理管理模式的设计与实施
Prim Care Diabetes. 2019 Apr;13(2):142-149. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
10
The impact of insulin glargine on clinical and humanistic outcomes in patients uncontrolled on other insulin and oral agents: an office-based naturalistic study.甘精胰岛素对使用其他胰岛素和口服药物血糖控制不佳患者临床及人文结局的影响:一项基于门诊的自然主义研究
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Nov;20(11):1703-10. doi: 10.1185/030079904X5526.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility and outcomes of using DIALOG+ in primary care to improve quality of life and mental distress of patients with long-term physical conditions: an exploratory non-controlled study in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Colombia and Uganda.在初级保健中使用 DIALOG+ 提高长期身体状况患者的生活质量和精神困扰的可行性和结果:在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那、哥伦比亚和乌干达进行的探索性非对照研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Nov 16;24(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02197-0.
2
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care.定义并衡量患者对医疗护理的满意度。
Eval Program Plann. 1983;6(3-4):247-63. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(83)90005-8.
2
The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs.MOS 36项简短健康调查(SF - 36):II. 测量身心健康结构的效度的心理测量和临床测试。
Med Care. 1993 Mar;31(3):247-63. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199303000-00006.
3
The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Telecoaching for Self-Care Management among Persons with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
系统评价和元分析:远程指导在 2 型糖尿病患者自我护理管理中的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 23;20(1):237. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010237.
4
Nurse-led care versus usual care on cardiovascular risk factors for patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.护士主导的护理与常规护理对 2 型糖尿病患者心血管风险因素的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 28;12(3):e058533. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058533.
5
The Effectiveness of Telemedicine Solutions for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression.远程医疗解决方案在 2 型糖尿病管理中的有效性:系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 May;17(3):794-825. doi: 10.1177/19322968211064633. Epub 2021 Dec 26.
6
The Effect of Care Provided at Home by Public Health Nurse on Control of Type II Diabetes Mellitus.公共卫生护士提供的居家护理对2型糖尿病控制的影响。
Florence Nightingale J Nurs. 2020 Oct 26;28(3):287-298. doi: 10.5152/FNJN.2020.19092. eCollection 2020 Oct.
7
Examining the Relationship Between Delay Discounting, Delay Aversion, Diabetes Self-care Behaviors, and Diabetes Outcomes in U.S. Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.探讨美国 2 型糖尿病成年患者中延迟折扣、延迟厌恶、糖尿病自我护理行为与糖尿病结局之间的关系。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Apr;44(4):893-900. doi: 10.2337/dc20-2620. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
8
Financial incentives to improve glycemic control in African American adults with type 2 diabetes: a pilot randomized controlled trial.改善 2 型糖尿病非裔美国成年人血糖控制的财务激励措施:一项试点随机对照试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 13;21(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-06029-0.
9
How does the use of digital consulting change the meaning of being a patient and/or a health professional? Lessons from the Long-term Conditions Young People Networked Communication study.数字咨询的使用如何改变患者和/或健康专业人员的角色意义?来自长期疾病青少年网络通信研究的经验教训。
Digit Health. 2020 Jul 20;6:2055207620942359. doi: 10.1177/2055207620942359. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
10
Team-Based Care to Improve Diabetes Management: A Community Guide Meta-analysis.基于团队的护理以改善糖尿病管理:社区指南荟萃分析。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Jul;57(1):e17-e26. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.02.005.
糖尿病强化治疗对胰岛素依赖型糖尿病长期并发症发生及进展的影响。
N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 30;329(14):977-86. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401.
4
The diabetes control and complications trial. Implications for policy and practice.糖尿病控制与并发症试验。对政策和实践的启示。
N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 30;329(14):1035-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199309303291410.
5
Cost-effectiveness of increased telephone contact for patients with osteoarthritis. A randomized, controlled trial.增加电话联系对骨关节炎患者的成本效益。一项随机对照试验。
Arthritis Rheum. 1993 Feb;36(2):243-6. doi: 10.1002/art.1780360216.
6
Does patient education in chronic disease have therapeutic value?慢性病患者教育具有治疗价值吗?
J Chronic Dis. 1982;35(7):521-9. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(82)90071-6.
7
The importance of classifying initial co-morbidity in evaluating the outcome of diabetes mellitus.在评估糖尿病预后时对初始合并症进行分类的重要性。
J Chronic Dis. 1974 Sep;27(7-8):387-404. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(74)90017-4.
8
The diabetes education study: a controlled trial of the effects of diabetes patient education.糖尿病教育研究:一项关于糖尿病患者教育效果的对照试验
Diabetes Care. 1986 Jan-Feb;9(1):1-10. doi: 10.2337/diacare.9.1.1.
9
Closing the gap: the problem of diabetes mellitus in the United States. The Carter Center of Emory University.缩小差距:美国的糖尿病问题。埃默里大学卡特中心。
Diabetes Care. 1985 Jul-Aug;8(4):391-406. doi: 10.2337/diacare.8.4.391.
10
A randomized study of the effects of a home diabetes education program.一项关于家庭糖尿病教育项目效果的随机研究。
Diabetes Care. 1986 Mar-Apr;9(2):173-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.9.2.173.