Hirayama A, Nanto S, Asada S, Adachi T, Mishima M, Matsumura Y, Naito J, Nishida K, Naka M, Inoue M
Cardiovascular Division, Osaka Police Hospital, Japan.
Int J Cardiol. 1994 Dec;47(1 Suppl):S39-47. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(94)90325-5.
The role of the angioplasty following thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction has been discussed in several studies, however the effect of successful angioplasty on infarct size and left ventricular function has not been properly evaluated. Successful reperfusion was achieved in 79 out of 104 patients with primary anterior acute myocardial infarction. These patients were classified as follows, according to the type of intervention during the acute phase: 50 patients in which thrombolysis was successful (the thrombolysis group); 12 patients who underwent successful immediate angioplasty following successful thrombolysis (the immediate angioplasty group); and 17 patients in which rescue angioplasty was successful (the rescue angioplasty group). The 25 patients whose infarct-related vessels were not reperfused after intervention were classified as the non-reperfused group. Infarct size, evaluated as defect volume by T1-201 SPECT, 1 month after the onset, was 840 +/- 154 units (mean +/- S.D.) in the immediate angioplasty group and was similar to that in the thrombolysis group (948 +/- 88 units), but significantly smaller than in the non-reperfused group (1759 +/- 108 units). There were no significant differences in left ventricular function in the immediate angioplasty group and the thrombolysis group. Successful rescue angioplasty did not have any beneficial effect on left ventricular functions or infarct size, when compared with the failed thrombolytic group (1105 +/- 169 units vs. 1617 +/- 169 units). End-diastolic volume (52 +/- 3 ml/m2) in the successful rescue angioplasty group, however, was significantly smaller than in the failed thrombolysis group (67 +/- 3 ml/m2).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
多项研究探讨了急性心肌梗死溶栓治疗后血管成形术的作用,然而,成功的血管成形术对梗死面积和左心室功能的影响尚未得到恰当评估。104例原发性前壁急性心肌梗死患者中,79例实现了成功再灌注。根据急性期的干预类型,这些患者分为以下几组:50例溶栓成功的患者(溶栓组);12例溶栓成功后立即进行成功血管成形术的患者(即刻血管成形术组);17例补救性血管成形术成功的患者(补救性血管成形术组)。干预后梗死相关血管未再灌注的25例患者被归为未再灌注组。发病1个月后,通过T1-201单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)评估梗死面积,以缺损体积表示,即刻血管成形术组为840±154单位(均值±标准差),与溶栓组(948±88单位)相似,但显著小于未再灌注组(1759±108单位)。即刻血管成形术组和溶栓组的左心室功能无显著差异。与溶栓失败组相比,成功的补救性血管成形术对左心室功能或梗死面积没有任何有益影响(1105±169单位对1617±169单位)。然而,成功的补救性血管成形术组的舒张末期容积(52±3 ml/m2)显著小于溶栓失败组(67±3 ml/m2)。(摘要截取自250字)