Hirayama A, Adachi T, Asada S, Mishima M, Nanto S, Kusuoka H, Yamamoto K, Matsumura Y, Hori M, Inoue M
Cardiovascular Division, Osaka Police Hospital, Japan.
Circulation. 1993 Dec;88(6):2565-74. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.6.2565.
While previous clinical studies have shown a possible beneficial effect of the reperfusion performed at a relatively late phase of acute myocardial infarction ("late reperfusion") in preventing left ventricular enlargement, the mechanism has not been clarified.
Of 89 patients with an initial anterior myocardial infarction, reperfusion was successful in 69. These 69 were divided into three groups according to the time required to achieve reperfusion after the onset of symptoms: early-reperfused (< 3 hours from the onset to reperfusion; n = 22), intermediate-reperfused (3 to 6 hours from the onset to reperfusion; n = 28), and late-reperfused (> 6 hours from the onset to reperfusion; n = 19). The 20 patients whose infarct-related artery were occluded in the acute phase as well as 1 month later was classified as nonreperfused. Infarct size, evaluated as defect volume by 201Tl single-photon emission computed tomography 1 month after the onset, was 1593 +/- 652 units (mean +/- SD) in the late-reperfused group, significantly larger (P < .05) than that of the intermediate-reperfused (1066 +/- 546 U) or the early-reperfused groups (372 +/- 453 U) but not different from that of the nonreperfused group (1736 +/- 562 U). Wall motion abnormality index as well as global ejection fraction evaluated by left ventriculography 1 month after the onset showed that late reperfusion did not preserve the left ventricular wall motion and function. These results indicate that the earlier reperfusion decreased the size of the infarction and preserved left ventricular function, whereas late reperfusion (> 6 hours after onset) did not limit infarct size or preserve left ventricular function. In contrast, the end-diastolic volume index did not differ significantly among the early-reperfused (50 +/- 15 mL/m2), intermediate-reperfused (54 +/- 14 mL/m2), and late-reperfused (53 +/- 19 mL/m2) groups; those were significantly smaller than that of the nonreperfused group (68 +/- 12 mL/m2; P < .05). Left ventriculographic data obtained in both the acute and chronic phase in 39 patients showed that left ventricular volumes increased significantly during the course of myocardial infarction only in the nonreperfused group.
Late reperfusion appeared to prevent ventricular dilatation acute myocardial infarction independent of the limitation of infarct size.
虽然先前的临床研究表明,在急性心肌梗死相对晚期进行再灌注(“晚期再灌注”)在预防左心室扩大方面可能具有有益作用,但其机制尚未阐明。
89例首次发生前壁心肌梗死的患者中,69例再灌注成功。根据症状发作后实现再灌注所需时间,将这69例患者分为三组:早期再灌注组(症状发作至再灌注<3小时;n = 22)、中期再灌注组(症状发作至再灌注3至6小时;n = 28)和晚期再灌注组(症状发作至再灌注>6小时;n = 19)。20例梗死相关动脉在急性期以及1个月后仍闭塞的患者被归类为未再灌注组。在症状发作1个月后通过201Tl单光子发射计算机断层扫描评估梗死面积,晚期再灌注组的梗死面积为1593±652单位(平均值±标准差),显著大于中期再灌注组(1066±546单位)或早期再灌注组(372±453单位)(P<.05),但与未再灌注组(1736±562单位)无差异。症状发作1个月后通过左心室造影评估的室壁运动异常指数以及整体射血分数显示,晚期再灌注并不能保留左心室壁运动和功能。这些结果表明,早期再灌注可减小梗死面积并保留左心室功能,而晚期再灌注(发作后>6小时)并不能限制梗死面积或保留左心室功能。相比之下,早期再灌注组(50±15 mL/m2)、中期再灌注组(54±14 mL/m2)和晚期再灌注组(53±19 mL/m^2)的舒张末期容积指数无显著差异;这些均显著小于未再灌注组(68±12 mL/m2;P<.05)。39例患者在急性期和慢性期获得的左心室造影数据显示,仅在未再灌注组中,左心室容积在心肌梗死过程中显著增加。
晚期再灌注似乎可预防急性心肌梗死患者的心室扩张,且与梗死面积的限制无关。