Bluechardt M H, Wiener J, Shephard R J
Faculty of Physical Activity Studies, University of Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Sports Med. 1995 Jan;19(1):55-72. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199519010-00005.
Learning disability is characterised by a discrepancy between achievement and assessed intellectual ability. Children with this problem commonly (but not invariably) show impaired motor proficiency, as assessed by such instruments as the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of motor proficiency. It has been hypothesised that poor motor performance and/or poor social skills lead to exclusion from games, creating a vicious cycle of decreasing participation, decreasing competence, a deterioration of self-worth and increasing social maladjustment. Attempts to break the vicious cycle with programmes designed to enhance motor proficiency have been uniformly unsuccessful. There is limited experimental evidence to support the view that structured physical activity programmes with an embedded social skills training component can be an effective method of enhancing both actual motor ability and self-perception of physical and academic competence. However, a controlled comparison with small-group, academic instruction has shown that, from the educational perspective, a physical activity-based intervention is no more effective than other forms of special attention. The main argument for delivering social skills training through a physical activity programme lies not in a unique impact upon learning disability, but rather in terms of the other well-established long term health benefits of exercise.
学习障碍的特点是学业成绩与评估的智力能力之间存在差异。患有这个问题的儿童通常(但并非总是)表现出运动能力受损,这是通过诸如布吕宁克斯 - 奥塞雷茨基运动能力测试等工具评估得出的。据推测,运动表现不佳和/或社交技能差会导致被排除在游戏之外,从而形成参与度下降、能力降低、自我价值恶化和社会适应不良加剧的恶性循环。试图通过旨在提高运动能力的项目来打破恶性循环的尝试均未成功。仅有有限的实验证据支持这样一种观点,即包含社交技能训练部分的结构化体育活动项目可以成为提高实际运动能力以及身体和学业能力自我认知的有效方法。然而,与小组学术指导的对照比较表明,从教育角度来看,基于体育活动的干预并不比其他形式的特殊关注更有效。通过体育活动项目提供社交技能训练的主要论据不在于对学习障碍有独特影响,而在于运动对健康的其他已确立的长期益处。