Vance H B, Singer M G, Engin A W
J Clin Psychol. 1980 Oct;36(4):953-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198010)36:4<953::aid-jclp2270360422>3.0.co;2-j.
Investigated the performance on the WISC-R of 98 learning disabled children and youth (69 males/29 females), who ranged in age from 6-3 to 13-6 to determine whether there were any significant subtests scale score differences between sexes. A 2 X 10 analysis of variance was used to analyze these data. Differences between the individual subtest means were analyzed by using Newman Keuls test for simple effects. Results indicated that males obtained higher (but not significant) scores on the six verbal subtest. Females scored significantly higher on coding than did their counterparts. In addition, the Verbal vs. Performance IQ dichotomy did not appear as useful evidence in the diagnosis of learning disabilities. Evidence from the investigation did not indicate that a significant interaction effect existed between sexes and WISC-R subtest scores.
对98名学习障碍儿童和青少年(69名男性/29名女性)进行了韦氏儿童智力量表修订版(WISC-R)测试,他们的年龄在6岁3个月至13岁6个月之间,以确定不同性别在各分测验量表得分上是否存在显著差异。采用2×10方差分析来分析这些数据。通过纽曼-基尔斯检验对简单效应分析各分测验均值之间的差异。结果表明,男性在六个言语分测验上得分较高(但不显著)。女性在译码测验上的得分显著高于男性。此外,言语智商与操作智商的二分法在学习障碍诊断中似乎并不是有用的证据。调查证据并未表明性别与WISC-R分测验得分之间存在显著的交互作用。