Suppr超能文献

系统性红斑狼疮中的抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体。患病率、特异性及临床意义。

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Prevalence, specificities, and clinical significance.

作者信息

Schnabel A, Csernok E, Isenberg D A, Mrowka C, Gross W L

机构信息

Universität Lübeck, Abteilung Klinische Rheumatologie, Germany.

出版信息

Arthritis Rheum. 1995 May;38(5):633-7. doi: 10.1002/art.1780380509.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the prevalence, subspecificities, and clinical associations of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

One hundred fifty-seven sera from 120 patients with SLE were examined for classic (c) and perinuclear (p) pattern ANCA by indirect immunofluorescence. Antibody subspecificities were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Serologic results were correlated with clinical manifestations as categorized by the BILAG (British Isles Lupus Assessment Group) index.

RESULTS

ANCA were found in 40 of the 157 sera (25%). Only a pANCA, not a cANCA, pattern of fluorescence was seen. By ELISA testing, 16 sera reacted to lactoferrin, 8 to elastase, and 4 to lysozyme. There was no reactivity to proteinase 3 (PR3) or myeloperoxidase (MPO). No correlation of pANCA, or any of the ANCA subspecificities, with organ system involvement, as categorized by the BILAG index, was found. Notably, there was no correlation of ANCA results with lupus vasculitis.

CONCLUSION

The absence of cANCA, anti-PR3, and anti-MPO shows that with appropriate assay conditions, ANCA testing assists in the differentiation between SLE and the ANCA-associated vasculitides. The lack of a correlation between pANCA or any ANCA subspecificity and clinical manifestations suggests that ANCA do not identify particular clinical subsets among SLE patients, including those with lupus vasculitis.

摘要

目的

研究系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)的患病率、亚特异性及其临床关联。

方法

采用间接免疫荧光法检测120例SLE患者的157份血清中的典型(c)型和核周(p)型ANCA。通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)确定抗体亚特异性。血清学结果与英国狼疮评估组(BILAG)指数分类的临床表现相关。

结果

157份血清中有40份(25%)检测到ANCA。仅观察到pANCA荧光模式,未观察到cANCA荧光模式。通过ELISA检测,16份血清与乳铁蛋白反应,8份与弹性蛋白酶反应,4份与溶菌酶反应。对蛋白酶3(PR3)或髓过氧化物酶(MPO)无反应。未发现pANCA或任何ANCA亚特异性与BILAG指数分类的器官系统受累之间存在相关性。值得注意的是,ANCA结果与狼疮性血管炎无相关性。

结论

cANCA、抗PR3和抗MPO的缺失表明,在适当的检测条件下,ANCA检测有助于区分SLE和ANCA相关血管炎。pANCA或任何ANCA亚特异性与临床表现之间缺乏相关性,提示ANCA不能识别SLE患者中的特定临床亚组,包括狼疮性血管炎患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验