• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声探头和耦合剂会成为接受超声检查患者医院感染的来源吗?一项体内和体外研究。

Can ultrasound probes and coupling gel be a source of nosocomial infection in patients undergoing sonography? An in vivo and in vitro study.

作者信息

Muradali D, Gold W L, Phillips A, Wilson S

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Toronto Hospital, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Jun;164(6):1521-4. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.6.7754907.

DOI:10.2214/ajr.164.6.7754907
PMID:7754907
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

At our institution, ultrasound probes are wiped with a clean, dry, soft, absorbent paper towel after each procedure as a basic standard of probe disinfection. However, it was unclear if this provided a sufficient level of decontamination. This study was designed to determine if the ultrasound probe and coupling gel can act as a vector of nosocomial infection and to describe a cost-effective method of probe handling that allows optimal control of infection.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

In the first part of the study, the ultrasound probe was exposed to the disrupted skin of patients recruited from our inpatient population, using our routine scanning technique to look for subcutaneous collections. Twenty-seven patients were scanned: 17 with surgical wounds, seven with surgical drains, four with enteric stomas, three with biopsy sites, and three with ulcers or excoriation. Fifteen patients had a discharge associated with their disrupted skin, and seven patients had culture-proved skin infections. Each probe was wiped with a clean, dry paper towel after scanning, then immersed in a brain-heart infusion (BHI) broth, and the solution was cultured. In the second part of the study, the ultrasound probe was exposed to a large inoculum of bacteria. Sixty-one probes were used to scan fields of confluent growth of bacteria on agar plates. Twenty-six probes were cleaned by wiping with a dry, clean paper towel, and 25 probes were cleaned by wiping with a dry, clean paper towel followed by immersion in Hibidil (0.05% chlorhexidine weight/volume). Ten probes functioned as controls and were not cleaned after exposure to the bacteria. Each probe was then immersed in BHI broth, and the solution was cultured. In the third part of the study, the coupling gel was evaluated as a culture medium for bacterial growth. Twenty-five agar plates were inoculated with a confluent growth of bacteria. Half of the surface of each agar plate was covered with coupling gel, and the remaining surface was left unexposed. The resulting bacterial growth on each side of the plates was compared.

RESULTS

One of the 27 probes exposed to patients with disrupted skin grew Staphylococcus epidermidis (skin flora). For probes exposed to a large inoculum of bacteria, we found no statistically significant difference in the number of probes that showed bacterial growth on culture between probes cleaned by wiping with a towel and those cleaned with Hibidil. Furthermore, the resulting bacterial growth in both sets of probes was scant and was not considered clinically significant. All 10 control probes showed clinically significant growth in all cases. As for evaluation of the coupling gel as a culture medium, the gel permitted bacterial growth and did not show any evidence of bacteriocidal or bacteriostatic properties.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound probes that are wiped with a paper towel until they are visibly clean do not contribute to nosocomial infections. Additional antiseptic solutions such as Hibidil are not necessary. We suggest that probes be simply wiped with a clean, dry, nonsterile paper towel between procedures, including probes used on contaminated scanning fields, open wounds, and cutaneous infections. After the final procedure of the day, probes should be cleaned with a liquid cleaning solution such as Hibidil to remove all traces of coupling gel, which could support the overnight growth of bacteria. This would decontaminate the probes and prevent the overnight growth of bacteria. This method would be both a cost-effective and time-efficient protocol for controlling infection.

摘要

目的

在我们机构,每次检查后用干净、干燥、柔软、吸水的纸巾擦拭超声探头,作为探头消毒的基本标准。然而,尚不清楚这是否能提供足够的去污水平。本研究旨在确定超声探头和耦合剂是否可作为医院感染的传播媒介,并描述一种具有成本效益的探头处理方法,以实现对感染的最佳控制。

对象与方法

在研究的第一部分,使用我们的常规扫描技术,将超声探头接触从住院患者中招募的皮肤破损患者,以寻找皮下积液。对27例患者进行了扫描:17例有手术伤口,7例有手术引流管,4例有肠造口,3例有活检部位,3例有溃疡或擦伤。15例患者的皮肤破损与出院有关,7例患者经培养证实有皮肤感染。每次扫描后,用干净、干燥的纸巾擦拭每个探头,然后将其浸入脑心浸液(BHI)肉汤中,并对溶液进行培养。在研究的第二部分,将超声探头暴露于大量细菌接种物中。使用61个探头扫描琼脂平板上细菌的融合生长区域。26个探头用干燥、干净的纸巾擦拭清洁,25个探头先用干燥、干净的纸巾擦拭,然后浸入希必迪(0.05%氯己定重量/体积)中清洁。10个探头作为对照,暴露于细菌后不进行清洁。然后将每个探头浸入BHI肉汤中,并对溶液进行培养。在研究的第三部分,评估耦合剂作为细菌生长培养基的情况。在25个琼脂平板上接种细菌的融合生长物。每个琼脂平板表面的一半覆盖耦合剂,其余表面不覆盖。比较平板两侧产生的细菌生长情况。

结果

接触皮肤破损患者的27个探头中有1个培养出表皮葡萄球菌(皮肤菌群)。对于暴露于大量细菌接种物的探头,我们发现用毛巾擦拭清洁的探头与用希必迪清洁的探头在培养时显示细菌生长的探头数量上没有统计学显著差异。此外,两组探头产生的细菌生长都很少且不被认为具有临床意义。所有10个对照探头在所有情况下均显示出具有临床意义的生长。至于将耦合剂作为培养基的评估,该耦合剂允许细菌生长,且未显示出任何杀菌或抑菌特性的证据。

结论

用纸巾擦拭直至超声探头明显清洁不会导致医院感染。无需额外的防腐剂溶液如希必迪。我们建议在检查过程之间,包括用于污染扫描区域、开放性伤口和皮肤感染的探头,只需用干净、干燥的非无菌纸巾擦拭探头。在当天的最后一次检查后,探头应用液体清洁溶液如希必迪进行清洁,以去除耦合剂的所有痕迹,耦合剂可能支持细菌过夜生长。这将对探头进行去污并防止细菌过夜生长。该方法将是一种控制感染的具有成本效益且高效的方案。

相似文献

1
Can ultrasound probes and coupling gel be a source of nosocomial infection in patients undergoing sonography? An in vivo and in vitro study.超声探头和耦合剂会成为接受超声检查患者医院感染的来源吗?一项体内和体外研究。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Jun;164(6):1521-4. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.6.7754907.
2
[Ultrasound guided regional anaesthesia: an effective method for cleaning the probes].[超声引导区域麻醉:一种清洁探头的有效方法]
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2008 Dec;27(12):994-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2008.10.003. Epub 2008 Nov 20.
3
Cleaning methods for ultrasound probes.超声探头的清洁方法。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2008 May;18(5):286-9.
4
A safe and practical decontamination method to reduce the risk of bacterial colonization of ultrasound transducers.一种安全实用的去污方法,可降低超声换能器细菌定植风险。
J Clin Ultrasound. 2014 Sep;42(7):395-8. doi: 10.1002/jcu.22142. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
5
Evaluation of a new disinfection procedure for ultrasound probes using ultraviolet light.使用紫外线对超声探头进行新消毒程序的评估。
J Hosp Infect. 2007 Feb;65(2):163-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.10.008. Epub 2006 Dec 14.
6
Evaluation of ultraviolet C for disinfection of endocavitary ultrasound transducers persistently contaminated despite probe covers.尽管探头套仍存在,但紫外线 C 对持续污染的内腔超声探头的消毒效果评估。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Feb;31(2):165-70. doi: 10.1086/649794.
7
Bacterial colonisation of Doppler probes on vascular surgical wards.血管外科病房中多普勒探头的细菌定植情况。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002 Mar;23(3):241-3. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2001.1552.
8
Is Transducer Hygiene sufficient when Vaginal Probes are used in the Clinical Routine?在临床常规操作中使用阴道探头时,换能器卫生是否足够?
Ultraschall Med. 2016 Apr;37(2):137-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-103605. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
9
Risk of nosocomial bacteria transmission: evaluation of cleaning methods of probes used for routine ultrasonography.医院内细菌传播风险:常规超声检查探头清洁方法的评估
West Afr J Med. 2005 Apr-Jun;24(2):167-70. doi: 10.4314/wajm.v24i2.28190.
10
Evaluation of a new disinfection method for ultrasound probes used for regional anesthesia: ultraviolet C light.评估一种用于区域麻醉的超声探头的新消毒方法:紫外线 C 光。
J Ultrasound Med. 2011 Jun;30(6):785-8. doi: 10.7863/jum.2011.30.6.785.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing Ultrasound Probe Disinfection for Healthcare-Associated Infection Control: A Comparative Analysis of Disinfectant Efficacy.优化超声探头消毒以控制医疗相关感染:消毒剂效果的比较分析
Microorganisms. 2024 Nov 22;12(12):2394. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12122394.
2
Radiology Department: A Potential Source of Multidrug-Resistant Microorganisms: A Cross-Sectional Study at Tertiary Hospital, Palestine.放射科:多重耐药微生物的一个潜在来源:巴勒斯坦一家三级医院的横断面研究
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2023 Dec 18;2023:4441338. doi: 10.1155/2023/4441338. eCollection 2023.
3
Preventing Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Transmission in the Intensive Care Unit with a Comprehensive Approach: A Policymaking Manual.
采用综合方法预防重症监护病房中的多重耐药菌传播:一份政策制定手册。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Jul 30;12(8):1255. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12081255.
4
Couplants in Acoustic Biosensing Systems.声学生物传感系统中的耦合剂。
Chemosensors (Basel). 2022 May 9;10(5):181. doi: 10.3390/chemosensors10050181. eCollection 2022 May.
5
Lung Sonography in Critical Care Medicine.重症医学中的肺部超声检查
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jun 6;12(6):1405. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061405.
6
Low-cost antimicrobial fortification of ultrasound coupling gel: An ergonomic innovation to combat sonology-acquired nosocomial infections.超声耦合剂的低成本抗菌强化:对抗超声检查所致医院感染的一项人体工程学创新。
Malawi Med J. 2019 Mar;31(1):45-49. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v31i1.8.
7
Infection prevention and control in ultrasound - best practice recommendations from the European Society of Radiology Ultrasound Working Group.超声检查中的感染预防与控制——欧洲放射学会超声工作组的最佳实践建议
Insights Imaging. 2017 Dec;8(6):523-535. doi: 10.1007/s13244-017-0580-3. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
8
A numerical analysis of a semi-dry coupling configuration in photoacoustic computed tomography for infant brain imaging.用于婴儿脑成像的光声计算机断层扫描中半干式耦合配置的数值分析。
Photoacoustics. 2017 Jun 21;7:27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2017.06.001. eCollection 2017 Sep.
9
Bacterial contamination of ultrasound probes in different radiological institutions before and after specific hygiene training: do we have a general hygienical problem?不同放射科机构超声探头使用前后的细菌污染:我们是否存在普遍的卫生问题?
Eur Radiol. 2017 Oct;27(10):4181-4187. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4812-1. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
10
The importance of infection prevention and control in medical ultrasound.医学超声中感染预防与控制的重要性
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2015 Aug;18(3):96-99. doi: 10.1002/j.2205-0140.2015.tb00207.x. Epub 2015 Dec 31.