Muradali D, Gold W L, Phillips A, Wilson S
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Toronto Hospital, Ontario, Canada.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Jun;164(6):1521-4. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.6.7754907.
At our institution, ultrasound probes are wiped with a clean, dry, soft, absorbent paper towel after each procedure as a basic standard of probe disinfection. However, it was unclear if this provided a sufficient level of decontamination. This study was designed to determine if the ultrasound probe and coupling gel can act as a vector of nosocomial infection and to describe a cost-effective method of probe handling that allows optimal control of infection.
In the first part of the study, the ultrasound probe was exposed to the disrupted skin of patients recruited from our inpatient population, using our routine scanning technique to look for subcutaneous collections. Twenty-seven patients were scanned: 17 with surgical wounds, seven with surgical drains, four with enteric stomas, three with biopsy sites, and three with ulcers or excoriation. Fifteen patients had a discharge associated with their disrupted skin, and seven patients had culture-proved skin infections. Each probe was wiped with a clean, dry paper towel after scanning, then immersed in a brain-heart infusion (BHI) broth, and the solution was cultured. In the second part of the study, the ultrasound probe was exposed to a large inoculum of bacteria. Sixty-one probes were used to scan fields of confluent growth of bacteria on agar plates. Twenty-six probes were cleaned by wiping with a dry, clean paper towel, and 25 probes were cleaned by wiping with a dry, clean paper towel followed by immersion in Hibidil (0.05% chlorhexidine weight/volume). Ten probes functioned as controls and were not cleaned after exposure to the bacteria. Each probe was then immersed in BHI broth, and the solution was cultured. In the third part of the study, the coupling gel was evaluated as a culture medium for bacterial growth. Twenty-five agar plates were inoculated with a confluent growth of bacteria. Half of the surface of each agar plate was covered with coupling gel, and the remaining surface was left unexposed. The resulting bacterial growth on each side of the plates was compared.
One of the 27 probes exposed to patients with disrupted skin grew Staphylococcus epidermidis (skin flora). For probes exposed to a large inoculum of bacteria, we found no statistically significant difference in the number of probes that showed bacterial growth on culture between probes cleaned by wiping with a towel and those cleaned with Hibidil. Furthermore, the resulting bacterial growth in both sets of probes was scant and was not considered clinically significant. All 10 control probes showed clinically significant growth in all cases. As for evaluation of the coupling gel as a culture medium, the gel permitted bacterial growth and did not show any evidence of bacteriocidal or bacteriostatic properties.
Ultrasound probes that are wiped with a paper towel until they are visibly clean do not contribute to nosocomial infections. Additional antiseptic solutions such as Hibidil are not necessary. We suggest that probes be simply wiped with a clean, dry, nonsterile paper towel between procedures, including probes used on contaminated scanning fields, open wounds, and cutaneous infections. After the final procedure of the day, probes should be cleaned with a liquid cleaning solution such as Hibidil to remove all traces of coupling gel, which could support the overnight growth of bacteria. This would decontaminate the probes and prevent the overnight growth of bacteria. This method would be both a cost-effective and time-efficient protocol for controlling infection.
在我们机构,每次检查后用干净、干燥、柔软、吸水的纸巾擦拭超声探头,作为探头消毒的基本标准。然而,尚不清楚这是否能提供足够的去污水平。本研究旨在确定超声探头和耦合剂是否可作为医院感染的传播媒介,并描述一种具有成本效益的探头处理方法,以实现对感染的最佳控制。
在研究的第一部分,使用我们的常规扫描技术,将超声探头接触从住院患者中招募的皮肤破损患者,以寻找皮下积液。对27例患者进行了扫描:17例有手术伤口,7例有手术引流管,4例有肠造口,3例有活检部位,3例有溃疡或擦伤。15例患者的皮肤破损与出院有关,7例患者经培养证实有皮肤感染。每次扫描后,用干净、干燥的纸巾擦拭每个探头,然后将其浸入脑心浸液(BHI)肉汤中,并对溶液进行培养。在研究的第二部分,将超声探头暴露于大量细菌接种物中。使用61个探头扫描琼脂平板上细菌的融合生长区域。26个探头用干燥、干净的纸巾擦拭清洁,25个探头先用干燥、干净的纸巾擦拭,然后浸入希必迪(0.05%氯己定重量/体积)中清洁。10个探头作为对照,暴露于细菌后不进行清洁。然后将每个探头浸入BHI肉汤中,并对溶液进行培养。在研究的第三部分,评估耦合剂作为细菌生长培养基的情况。在25个琼脂平板上接种细菌的融合生长物。每个琼脂平板表面的一半覆盖耦合剂,其余表面不覆盖。比较平板两侧产生的细菌生长情况。
接触皮肤破损患者的27个探头中有1个培养出表皮葡萄球菌(皮肤菌群)。对于暴露于大量细菌接种物的探头,我们发现用毛巾擦拭清洁的探头与用希必迪清洁的探头在培养时显示细菌生长的探头数量上没有统计学显著差异。此外,两组探头产生的细菌生长都很少且不被认为具有临床意义。所有10个对照探头在所有情况下均显示出具有临床意义的生长。至于将耦合剂作为培养基的评估,该耦合剂允许细菌生长,且未显示出任何杀菌或抑菌特性的证据。
用纸巾擦拭直至超声探头明显清洁不会导致医院感染。无需额外的防腐剂溶液如希必迪。我们建议在检查过程之间,包括用于污染扫描区域、开放性伤口和皮肤感染的探头,只需用干净、干燥的非无菌纸巾擦拭探头。在当天的最后一次检查后,探头应用液体清洁溶液如希必迪进行清洁,以去除耦合剂的所有痕迹,耦合剂可能支持细菌过夜生长。这将对探头进行去污并防止细菌过夜生长。该方法将是一种控制感染的具有成本效益且高效的方案。