Badiani A, Morano M I, Akil H, Robinson T E
Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48104-1687, USA.
Brain Res. 1995 Feb 27;673(1):13-24. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)01365-o.
We reported previously that when amphetamine is given in NOVEL test cages both its acute psychomotor activating effects (rotational behaviour and locomotor activity) and the degree of sensitization are greater than when amphetamine is given in HOME cages that are physically identical to the NOVEL test cages. Since exposure to the NOVEL environment increases plasma corticosterone levels (Experiment 1) it is possible that the enhancement in the effects of amphetamine in the NOVEL condition is mediated by corticosterone. If this hypothesis is correct adrenalectomy (ADX) should abolish the difference between the HOME and NOVEL groups. This was tested in three independent experiments, in which the response (rotational behavior in Experiments 2 and 3; locomotor activity and rearing behavior in Experiment 4) to repeated injections of amphetamine was assessed in rats that underwent adrenalectomy (ADX) or a sham operation (SHAM). ADX animals received either no corticosterone replacement or one of two corticosterone replacement treatments. Adrenalectomy, with or without corticosterone replacement treatment, had no significant effect on the development of amphetamine sensitization, either in the HOME or the NOVEL environment. By contrast, the effects of adrenalectomy on the acute response to amphetamine varied depending on the behavioral measure and possibly on the dose of amphetamine (2.0 mg/kg, 3.0 mg/kg and 1.5 mg/kg IP, in Experiments 2, 3 and 4, respectively). We conclude that: (i) a stress-induced secretion of adrenal hormones is not responsible for the enhancement in sensitization to amphetamine seen in animals tested in a NOVEL environment; (ii) circulating adrenal hormones are not necessary for development of sensitization to the psychomotor activating effects of amphetamine.
我们之前报道过,当在新奇测试笼中给予苯丙胺时,其急性精神运动激活作用(旋转行为和运动活动)以及敏感化程度均大于在与新奇测试笼物理相同的家笼中给予苯丙胺时的情况。由于暴露于新奇环境会增加血浆皮质酮水平(实验1),因此在新奇条件下苯丙胺作用增强可能是由皮质酮介导的。如果该假设正确,肾上腺切除术(ADX)应消除家笼组和新奇组之间的差异。这在三个独立实验中进行了测试,其中在接受肾上腺切除术(ADX)或假手术(SHAM)的大鼠中评估了对重复注射苯丙胺的反应(实验2和3中的旋转行为;实验4中的运动活动和竖毛行为)。ADX动物要么不接受皮质酮替代治疗,要么接受两种皮质酮替代治疗之一。无论有无皮质酮替代治疗,肾上腺切除术对苯丙胺敏感化的发展在家庭或新奇环境中均无显著影响。相比之下,肾上腺切除术对苯丙胺急性反应的影响因行为指标以及可能因苯丙胺剂量而异(实验2、3和4中分别为2.0mg/kg、3.0mg/kg和1.5mg/kg腹腔注射)。我们得出结论:(i)应激诱导的肾上腺激素分泌与在新奇环境中测试的动物对苯丙胺敏感化增强无关;(ii)循环肾上腺激素对于对苯丙胺精神运动激活作用的敏感化发展不是必需的。