Wallace W P, Stewart M T, Sherman H L, Mellor M D
Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno 89557, USA.
Cognition. 1995 Apr;55(1):85-113. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)00646-3.
Cohort theory in spoken-word recognition assumes that a cohort of word candidates consistent with incoming sensory information is activated implicitly as a spoken sound stimulus unfolds over time. Five experiments examined implications of this internal-generation-of-words mechanism. In Experiments 1 and 2, a "base" word was disqualified (the sensory information was no longer consistent with the word) either early or late in the presentation of a spoken stimulus. On a later recognition-memory test, significantly more false-positive errors occurred to base words following presentations of study items that had late, compared to early, disqualification points. Experiments 3-5 tested whether this phenomenon could be accounted for in terms of overlapping features between non-word stimuli and their base words or in terms of a post-identification processing mechanism. Experiment 3 replicated Experiments 1 and 2, and demonstrated that differences in early and late disqualification points for non-word targets, unlike word targets, were not related to false-positive recognition memory errors. The study inter-item interval in Experiment 4 was reduced to 1 s to minimize the role of post-identification processing activities, and the results for both word and non-word targets were consistent with Experiment 3. A word-association task in Experiment 5 revealed that the late non-word derivations used in this research were on the average more effective stimuli than the early non-word derivations in eliciting their base words. However, even when comparisons were restricted to item sets with early and late non-words that were equally effective in eliciting base words, false-positive recognition memory errors to target words were higher following prior presentations of their late derived non-words than following prior presentations of their early derived non-words.
口语单词识别中的群组理论假定,随着语音刺激随时间展开,与传入感官信息一致的一组单词候选会被隐式激活。五项实验检验了这种单词内部生成机制的影响。在实验1和实验2中,一个“基础”单词在口语刺激呈现的早期或晚期被排除(感官信息不再与该单词一致)。在随后的识别记忆测试中,与早期排除点相比,在具有晚期排除点的学习项目呈现后,基础单词出现的假阳性错误显著更多。实验3 - 5测试了这种现象是否可以用非单词刺激与其基础单词之间的重叠特征来解释,或者用识别后处理机制来解释。实验3重复了实验1和实验2,并表明非单词目标的早期和晚期排除点的差异与单词目标不同,与假阳性识别记忆错误无关。实验4将研究项目间的间隔缩短至1秒,以尽量减少识别后处理活动的作用,单词和非单词目标的结果与实验3一致。实验5中的一个单词联想任务表明,本研究中使用的晚期非单词派生形式在引出其基础单词方面平均比早期非单词派生形式更有效。然而,即使将比较限制在对引出基础单词同样有效的早期和晚期非单词的项目集上,目标单词在先前呈现其晚期派生非单词后出现的假阳性识别记忆错误也高于先前呈现其早期派生非单词后出现的情况。