Clark S E
Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside 92521.
Mem Cognit. 1992 May;20(3):231-43. doi: 10.3758/bf03199660.
The word frequency effect (WFE) has been taken as evidence that recall and recognition are in some way fundamentally different. Consequently, most models assume that recall and recognition operate via very different retrieval mechanisms. Experiment 1 showed that the WFE reverses for associative recognition, which requires discrimination between intact test pairs and recombinations of study list words from different study pairs. Experiment 2, in which word triples were used, revealed an interaction between word frequency and test type: for item recognition, performance was better for low-frequency words; however, for associative recognition and free recall, performance was better for high-frequency words. In Experiment 3, item recognition was tested: although overall performance was better for low-frequency words, the recognition advantage for items in intact pairs was larger for high-frequency words, suggesting two components in recognition memory. These results imply common mechanisms in recall and recognition. Theoretical implications are discussed within the framework of the SAM model.
词频效应(WFE)被视为回忆和识别在某种程度上存在根本差异的证据。因此,大多数模型认为回忆和识别通过截然不同的检索机制运作。实验1表明,对于联想识别,词频效应会反转,联想识别要求区分完整的测试对与来自不同学习对的学习列表单词的重组。实验2使用了单词三元组,揭示了词频与测试类型之间的交互作用:对于项目识别,低频词的表现更好;然而,对于联想识别和自由回忆,高频词的表现更好。在实验3中,对项目识别进行了测试:尽管低频词的总体表现更好,但完整对中项目的识别优势对于高频词更大,这表明识别记忆中有两个成分。这些结果意味着回忆和识别存在共同机制。在SAM模型的框架内讨论了理论意义。