Simmons-O'Brien E, Chen S, Watson R, Antoni C, Petri M, Hochberg M, Stevens M B, Provost T T
Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Medicine (Baltimore). 1995 May;74(3):109-30. doi: 10.1097/00005792-199505000-00001.
To explore further the varied clinical expression of anti-Ro(SS-A) antibody positive patients and to determine the outcomes of these patients, we followed 100 anti-Ro(SS-A) antibody positive patients, originally seen at the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions in 1982 and 1983, over a 10-year period. The results of this study indicate that anti-Ro(SS-A) antibody positive patients have a diverse clinical presentation and that the anti-Ro(SS-A) antibody response generally persists for years. Some of these patients appear to have a static disease process for years. However, 65% (51, including 13 deaths, of 78 patients) of the patients for whom we had follow-up data had a chronic (10 years or greater) progressive disease process. Black patients, in general, have an earlier onset of disease and may have a more severe disease than white patients. At least 25% of our anti-Ro(SS-A) antibody positive patients demonstrated a dynamic change in clinical presentation with the development of Sjögren syndrome and/or a progressive "rheumatoid-like" arthritis. Interstitial pulmonary disease, central nervous system disease, and vasculitic insults occur frequently in these patients. Renal disease occurred in 19 anti-Ro(SS-A) positive patients, and in 47% of these renal disease patients, no anti-DNA antibodies (dsDNA or ssDNA) were detected. Cutaneous manifestations are prominent in anti-Ro(SS-A) antibody positive patients with lupus. Photosensitivity and a malar dermatitis were the most common features. Twenty percent of lupus patients had discoid lesions, and 20% had SCLE lesions. Based on this study, we believe that anti-Ro(SS-A) antibody positive patients should be routinely evaluated for the emergence of systemic features. Since these systemic features are at least in part, if not solely, the result of inflammation, early treatment with steroids and/or immunosuppressive agents may minimize the damage and influence in a positive manner the significant morbidity and mortality observed in some anti-Ro(SS-A) antibody positive patients.
为进一步探究抗Ro(SS-A)抗体阳性患者的多样临床表型并确定这些患者的预后,我们对1982年和1983年最初在约翰霍普金斯医疗机构就诊的100例抗Ro(SS-A)抗体阳性患者进行了为期10年的随访。这项研究结果表明,抗Ro(SS-A)抗体阳性患者有多样的临床表现,且抗Ro(SS-A)抗体反应通常会持续数年。其中一些患者多年来病情似乎呈静止状态。然而,在我们有随访数据的患者中,65%(78例患者中的51例,包括13例死亡)有慢性(10年或更长时间)进展性疾病过程。总体而言,黑人患者发病较早,病情可能比白人患者更严重。我们至少25%的抗Ro(SS-A)抗体阳性患者随着干燥综合征和/或进行性“类风湿样”关节炎的发展,临床表现出现动态变化。间质性肺疾病、中枢神经系统疾病和血管炎性损伤在这些患者中频繁出现。19例抗Ro(SS-A)阳性患者出现肾脏疾病,在这些肾脏疾病患者中,47%未检测到抗DNA抗体(双链DNA或单链DNA)。皮肤表现在抗Ro(SS-A)抗体阳性的狼疮患者中很突出。光敏性和颊部皮炎是最常见的特征。20%的狼疮患者有盘状皮损,20%有亚急性皮肤型红斑狼疮皮损。基于这项研究,我们认为抗Ro(SS-A)抗体阳性患者应常规评估是否出现系统性特征。由于这些系统性特征至少部分(如果不是完全)是炎症的结果,早期使用类固醇和/或免疫抑制剂治疗可能会将损害降至最低,并以积极方式影响一些抗Ro(SS-A)抗体阳性患者中观察到的显著发病率和死亡率。