Eggli K D, Close P, Dillon P W, Umlauf M, Hopper K D
Department of Radiology, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey 17033, USA.
Pediatr Radiol. 1995;25(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02020828.
In pediatric oncology, therapeutic decisions are made based on tumor response to chemotherapeutic agents. Sequential measurement of tumor bulk and its percent change on therapy must be accurately assessed. Will 3-dimensional (3-D) volumetric determination improve our ability to assess tumor response to therapy? Forty-five CT scans of pediatric patients with unresectable thoracic or abdominal neoplasia were assessed for tumor bulk by the standard "2-dimensional (2-D)" volume formula (cross-sectional area x length) and by 3-D volumetric analysis. Thirty-two examinations were performed in follow-up, and percent change in tumor size was calculated. The 2-D volume calculation overestimated tumor volume by more than 50% on all but two examinations when the 2-D volume was compared with the 3-D volume. In 28% of follow-up examinations, the 2-D calculation of percent change differed by more than 10% from the 3-D volume. Fifteen percent differed by over 25%. This changed the response category of one patient from "no response" to "partial response". 3-D volumetric analysis, easily performed by a trained technologist, will give more accurate assessment of the actual tumor bulk and its subsequent changes in size in response to therapy.
在儿科肿瘤学中,治疗决策是基于肿瘤对化疗药物的反应做出的。必须准确评估肿瘤体积的连续测量及其在治疗中的百分比变化。三维(3-D)体积测定能否提高我们评估肿瘤对治疗反应的能力?通过标准的“二维(2-D)”体积公式(横截面积×长度)和三维体积分析,对45例患有不可切除的胸部或腹部肿瘤的儿科患者的CT扫描进行了肿瘤体积评估。进行了32次随访检查,并计算了肿瘤大小的百分比变化。当将二维体积与三维体积进行比较时,除了两次检查外,二维体积计算在所有检查中都高估了肿瘤体积50%以上。在28%的随访检查中,二维计算的百分比变化与三维体积相差超过10%。15%的差异超过25%。这将一名患者的反应类别从“无反应”改为“部分反应”。由训练有素的技术人员轻松进行的三维体积分析,将更准确地评估实际肿瘤体积及其在治疗后大小的后续变化。