Chong D K
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Stroke. 1995 Jun;26(6):1119-22. doi: 10.1161/01.str.26.6.1119.
Functional assessment in stroke patients is critical in both clinical practice and outcome studies. Ability in the areas relating to instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) that require increased interaction with the environment, whether household or community, appears to be a prerequisite for independent living in the community. The majority of the research in this area has been in the geriatric population. A literature review was undertaken to answer the following questions: What is a working definition of IADL? What are the criteria that determine inclusion with specific applicability in the stroke population? What are the reliability and validity of available measures in the stroke population? What is the relevance of IADL to functional outcome?
The findings at this time indicate that there is no consensus for a clear definition of IADL. The terminology used includes the original IADL as described by Lawton and Brody, extended ADL, social ADL, and advanced ADL. Four scales that were designed primarily for use in the stroke population were identified: the Nottingham Extended ADL (a self-report scale), the Hamrin Activity Index and the Frenchay Activities Index (both based on patient interviews), and the Household section of the Rivermead ADL Assessment (a performance index).
There is some published evidence concerning the validity, reliability, utility, sensitivity, or hierarchical nature of these indexes, and further testing is needed. The items in each index, however, have inherent relevance with potential for use in future clinical research.
在临床实践和结局研究中,对中风患者进行功能评估至关重要。在与日常生活工具性活动(IADL)相关的领域中,无论在家庭还是社区环境下,与环境互动增加的能力似乎是在社区独立生活的先决条件。该领域的大多数研究都针对老年人群体。进行了一项文献综述以回答以下问题:IADL的有效定义是什么?在中风人群中确定纳入的具体适用标准是什么?中风人群中现有测量方法的信度和效度如何?IADL与功能结局的相关性是什么?
目前的研究结果表明,对于IADL的明确定义尚无共识。使用的术语包括Lawton和Brody最初描述的IADL、扩展ADL、社会ADL和高级ADL。确定了四种主要为中风人群设计的量表:诺丁汉扩展ADL量表(一种自评量表)、哈姆林活动指数和法国ay活动指数(均基于患者访谈)以及里弗米德ADL评估量表的家庭部分(一种表现指数)。
关于这些指数的效度、信度、实用性、敏感性或层级性质,有一些已发表的证据,但仍需要进一步测试。然而,每个指数中的项目都具有内在相关性,有可能用于未来的临床研究。