McEwen J E
Division of Social Science, Ethics, and Law, Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center for Mental Retardation, Waltham, MA 02254, USA.
Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Jun;56(6):1487-92.
This article reports the results of a survey of the responsible crime laboratories in the first 19 states with legislation establishing forensic DNA data banks. The survey inquired into the labs' policies and procedures regarding the collection, storage, and analysis of samples; the retention of samples and data; search protocols; access to samples and data by third parties; and related matters. The research suggests that (1) the number of samples collected from convicted offenders for DNA data banking has far surpassed the number that have been analyzed; (2) data banks have already been used in a small but growing number of cases, to locate suspects and to identify associations between unresolved cases; (3) crime labs currently plan to retain indefinitely the samples collected for their data banks; and (4) the nature and extent of security safeguards that crime labs have implemented for their data banks vary among states. The recently enacted DNA Identification Act (1994) will provide $40 million in federal matching grants to states for DNA analysis activities, so long as states comply with specified quality-assurance standards, submit to external proficiency testing, and limit access to DNA information. Although these additional funds should help to ease some sample backlogs, it remains unclear how labs will allocate the funds, as between analyzing samples for their data banks and testing evidence samples in cases without suspects. The DNA Identification Act provides penalties for the disclosure or obtaining of DNA data held by data banks that participate in CODIS, the FBI's evolving national network of DNA data banks, but individual crime labs must also develop stringent internal safeguards to prevent breaches of data-bank security.
本文报告了对前19个制定了法医DNA数据库立法的州中负责的犯罪实验室的一项调查结果。该调查询问了实验室在样本采集、存储和分析、样本及数据保留、搜索协议、第三方获取样本及数据以及相关事项方面的政策和程序。研究表明:(1)为DNA数据库从已定罪罪犯处采集的样本数量已远远超过已分析的样本数量;(2)数据库已在少数但数量不断增加的案件中得到使用,用于查找嫌疑人以及确定未决案件之间的关联;(3)犯罪实验室目前计划无限期保留为其数据库采集的样本;(4)犯罪实验室为其数据库实施的安全保障措施的性质和程度在各州之间存在差异。最近颁布的《DNA鉴定法》(1994年)将向各州提供4000万美元的联邦配套赠款,用于DNA分析活动,只要各州遵守特定的质量保证标准、接受外部能力验证测试并限制对DNA信息的访问。尽管这些额外资金应有助于缓解一些样本积压问题,但目前尚不清楚实验室将如何在为其数据库分析样本和在无嫌疑人案件中测试证据样本之间分配资金。《DNA鉴定法》对参与联合DNA索引系统(CODIS,联邦调查局不断发展的全国性DNA数据库网络)的数据库所保存的DNA数据的披露或获取行为规定了处罚措施,但各犯罪实验室也必须制定严格的内部保障措施,以防止数据库安全遭到破坏。