Debus-Sherrill Sara, Field Michael B
ICF, 9300 Lee Highway, Fairfax, VA 22031, United States.
Sci Justice. 2019 Jan;59(1):20-28. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
In recent years, jurisdictions across the United States have expressed a growing interest in aiding criminal investigations through the use of familial DNA searching (FDS)- a forensic technique to identify family members through DNA databases. The National Survey of CODIS Laboratories surveyed U.S. CODIS laboratories about their perceptions, policies, and practices related to FDS. In total, 103 crime labs completed the survey (77% response rate). Labs in 11 states reported using FDS, while labs in 24 states reported using a similar-but distinct- practice of partial matching. Although the majority of labs had positive perceptions about the ability of FDS to assist investigations, labs also reported a number of concerns and challenges with implementing FDS. Respondents reported using either practice a limited amount with modest numbers of convictions resulting from both FDS and partial matching. The article reports on varying practices related to official policies, training, eligibility, the software search, lineage testing, requirements for releasing information, and subsequent investigative work. Finally, the article discusses what can be learned from this survey, accompanying limitations, and implications for decision-makers considering using FDS.
近年来,美国各地的司法管辖区对通过使用家族DNA搜索(FDS)来协助刑事调查表现出越来越浓厚的兴趣,FDS是一种通过DNA数据库识别家庭成员的法医技术。美国联合DNA索引系统(CODIS)实验室全国调查就FDS相关的看法、政策和做法对美国的CODIS实验室进行了调查。共有103个犯罪实验室完成了调查(回复率为77%)。11个州的实验室报告使用了FDS,而24个州的实验室报告使用了类似但不同的部分匹配做法。尽管大多数实验室对FDS协助调查的能力持积极看法,但实验室也报告了实施FDS存在的一些担忧和挑战。受访者报告称,这两种做法的使用都有限,通过FDS和部分匹配得出的定罪数量不多。本文报道了与官方政策、培训、资格、软件搜索、谱系测试、信息发布要求以及后续调查工作相关的不同做法。最后,本文讨论了从这项调查中可以学到什么、随之而来的局限性以及对考虑使用FDS的决策者的影响。