Clynes M, Heenan M, Hall K
National Cell and Tissue Culture Centre/BioResearch Ireland, Dublin City University.
Cytotechnology. 1993;12(1-3):231-56. doi: 10.1007/BF00744666.
In spite of our expanding knowledge on the molecular biology of cancer, relatively little progress has been made in improving therapy for the solid tumours which are major killers, e.g., lung, colon, breast. Significant advances over the past 10-15 years in chemotherapy of some tumours such as testicular cancer and some leukaemias indicates that, in spite of the undesirable side-effects, chemotherapy has the potential to effect cure in the majority of patients with certain types of cancer. Multidrug resistance, inherent or acquired, is one important limiting factor in extending this success to most solid tumours. In vitro studies described in this review are now uncovering a diversity of possible mechanisms of cross-resistance to different types of drug. Sensitive methods such as immunocytochemistry, RT-PCR or in situ RNA hybridisation may be necessary to identify corresponding changes in clinical material. Only by classifying individual tumours according to their specific resistance mechanisms will it be possible to define the multidrug resistance problem properly. Such rigorous definition is a prerequisite to design (and choice on an individual basis) of specific therapies suited to individual patients. Since a much larger proportion of cancer biopsies should be susceptible to accurate analysis by the immunochemical and molecular biological techniques described above than to direct assessment of drug response, it seems reasonable to hope that this approach will succeed in improving results for cancer chemotherapy of solid tumours where other approaches such as individualised in vitro chemosensitivity testing have essentially failed. Results from clinical trials using cyclosporin A or verapamil are encouraging, but these agents are far from ideal, and reverse resistance in only a subset of resistant tumours. Proper definition of the other mechanisms of MDR, and how to antagonize them, is an urgent research priority.
尽管我们对癌症分子生物学的认识不断扩展,但在改善对主要致命实体瘤(如肺癌、结肠癌、乳腺癌)的治疗方面进展相对较小。过去10 - 15年中,某些肿瘤(如睾丸癌和一些白血病)的化疗取得了显著进展,这表明尽管存在不良副作用,但化疗在大多数特定类型癌症患者中仍有治愈的潜力。多药耐药性,无论是固有还是后天获得的,都是将这种成功扩展到大多数实体瘤的一个重要限制因素。本综述中描述的体外研究正在揭示对不同类型药物交叉耐药的多种可能机制。可能需要敏感的方法,如免疫细胞化学、逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)或原位RNA杂交,来识别临床材料中的相应变化。只有根据个体肿瘤的特定耐药机制进行分类,才有可能正确界定多药耐药问题。这种严格的定义是设计(并根据个体情况选择)适合个体患者的特定疗法的先决条件。由于与直接评估药物反应相比,更大比例的癌症活检样本应该易于通过上述免疫化学和分子生物学技术进行准确分析,因此有理由希望这种方法能够成功改善实体瘤癌症化疗的结果,而其他方法,如个体化体外化疗敏感性测试,基本上已经失败。使用环孢素A或维拉帕米的临床试验结果令人鼓舞,但这些药物远非理想,仅能逆转一部分耐药肿瘤的耐药性。正确界定多药耐药的其他机制以及如何对抗它们,是当前迫切的研究重点。