Kramer N, Meyer T J, Meharg J, Cece R D, Hill N S
Pulmonary Division, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Jun;151(6):1799-806. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.151.6.7767523.
Recent studies suggest that noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) administered by nasal or oronasal mask avoids the need for endotracheal intubation, rapidly improves vital signs, gas exchange, and sense of dyspnea, and may reduce mortality in selected patients with acute respiratory failure, but few controlled trials have been done. The present study used a randomized prospective design to evaluate the possible benefits of NPPV plus standard therapy versus standard therapy alone in patients with acute respiratory failure. Patients to receive NPPV were comfortably fitted with a standard nasal mask connected to a BiPAP ventilatory assist device (Respironics, Inc., Murrysville, PA) in the patient flow-triggered/time-triggered (S/T) mode, and standard therapy consisted of all other treatments deemed necessary by the primary physician, including endotracheal intubation. The need for intubation was reduced from 73% in the standard therapy group (11 of 15 patients) to 31% in the NPPV group (5 of 16 patients, p < 0.05). Among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, the reduction was even more striking, with 8 of 12 (67%) control patients requiring intubation compared with 1 of 11 (9%) NPPV patients (p < 0.05). Heart and respiratory rates were significantly lower in the NPPV group than in control patients within 1 h, and PaO2 was significantly improved in the NPPV group for the first 6 h. Dyspnea scores and maximal inspiratory pressures were better in the NPPV than in control patients at 6 h, and nurses and therapists spent similar amounts of time at the bedside for both groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
近期研究表明,经鼻或口鼻面罩进行无创正压通气(NPPV)可避免气管插管的需要,能迅速改善生命体征、气体交换及呼吸困难感,且可能降低部分急性呼吸衰竭患者的死亡率,但相关对照试验较少。本研究采用随机前瞻性设计,评估NPPV联合标准治疗与单纯标准治疗相比,对急性呼吸衰竭患者可能带来的益处。接受NPPV治疗的患者舒适地佩戴与双水平气道正压通气辅助设备(Respironics公司,宾夕法尼亚州默里斯维尔)相连的标准鼻面罩,采用患者流量触发/时间触发(S/T)模式,标准治疗包括由主治医生认为必要的所有其他治疗,包括气管插管。插管需求从标准治疗组的73%(15例患者中的11例)降至NPPV组的31%(16例患者中的5例,p<0.05)。在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中,这种降低更为显著,12例对照患者中有8例(67%)需要插管,而11例NPPV患者中有1例(9%)需要插管(p<0.05)。NPPV组在1小时内心率和呼吸频率显著低于对照组患者,且前6小时内NPPV组的动脉血氧分压(PaO2)显著改善。6小时时,NPPV组的呼吸困难评分和最大吸气压力优于对照组患者,两组护士和治疗师在床边花费的时间相近。(摘要截选至250字)