Chin D P, Yajko D M, Hadley W K, Sanders C A, Nassos P S, Madej J J, Hopewell P C
Medical Service, San Francisco General Hospital Medical Center, California, USA.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Jun;151(6):1872-7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.151.6.7767534.
Several studies have reported using methods based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory tract specimens. However, little is known about the actual clinical utility of PCR-based tests, and it is uncertain if PCR technology can be transferred to the clinical laboratory. To determine its utility, we evaluated a commercially developed PCR test system in a clinical laboratory using consecutive respiratory tract specimens. Microscopic examination of smears stained with acid-fast bacilli (AFB), culture, and a PCR-based test (Amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosis assay; Roche Molecular Systems) were used to evaluate 535 consecutive sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage specimens from 227 patients. A clinical case definition of tuberculosis was used as the reference-standard to determine the utility of all diagnostic tests. For all specimens from patients with a new or a treatment-failure case of pulmonary tuberculosis, the positivity rate of PCR (58%) was similar to that of culture (56%) (p > 0.90) and substantially greater than microscopic examination of AFB-stained smears (22%) (p < 0.001). PCR and culture detected M. tuberculosis in 46 and 43%, respectively, of the specimens from patients who did not have AFB on microscopic examination of their respiratory tract specimens (p > 0.90). PCR had a false positive rate of 0.8%. In several instances, PCR detected M. tuberculosis when culture did not; and vice versa. The clinical utility of this PCR-based test is similar to that of culture for detecting M. tuberculosis in respiratory tract specimens.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
多项研究报告了使用基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的方法来检测呼吸道标本中的结核分枝杆菌。然而,对于基于PCR的检测方法的实际临床效用知之甚少,并且不确定PCR技术能否转移到临床实验室。为了确定其效用,我们在临床实验室中使用连续的呼吸道标本对一种商业开发的PCR检测系统进行了评估。使用抗酸杆菌(AFB)染色涂片的显微镜检查、培养以及基于PCR的检测(Amplicor结核分枝杆菌检测;罗氏分子系统公司)对来自227例患者的535份连续痰液和支气管肺泡灌洗标本进行了评估。将肺结核的临床病例定义用作参考标准来确定所有诊断检测的效用。对于所有来自新发或治疗失败的肺结核患者的标本,PCR的阳性率(58%)与培养的阳性率(56%)相似(p>0.90),且显著高于抗酸杆菌染色涂片的显微镜检查阳性率(22%)(p<0.001)。在呼吸道标本显微镜检查未发现抗酸杆菌的患者的标本中,PCR和培养分别在46%和43%的标本中检测到结核分枝杆菌(p>0.90)。PCR的假阳性率为0.8%。在一些情况下,PCR检测到结核分枝杆菌而培养未检测到;反之亦然。这种基于PCR的检测方法在检测呼吸道标本中的结核分枝杆菌方面的临床效用与培养相似。(摘要截短于250字)