Suppr超能文献

[药物临床试验:审批过程的影响]

[Clinical trials with drugs: the influence of the authorization process].

作者信息

Carcas A J, Serrano M A, Avendaño C, Galende I, Tristán C, García-Alonso F

机构信息

Subdirección General de Evaluación de Medicamentos, Dirección General de Farmacia y Productos Sanitarios, Madrid.

出版信息

Med Clin (Barc). 1995 May 13;104(18):683-8.

PMID:7769877
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prevailing regulations require previous review and approval by the administrative authority for clinical trials with drugs in Spain. These regulations have led to the development of a data base of clinical trials submitted for authorization by the Ministry of Health and Welfare. The influence of the evaluation process of authorized clinical trials and the final quality of these trials were studied through this data base.

METHODS

The following data corresponding to 1989 and 1990 and grouped in 9 aspects were collected: clarifications applied to protocols of clinical trials, modifications carried out and the causes motivating refusal. Likewise were analyzed the evaluation of quality of each of the aspects considered and the methodological characteristics of the authorized trials.

RESULTS

In 1989 and 1990, 298 and 349 protocols of clinical trials were presented; clarifications were requested to 72% in 1989 and to 55% in 1990 (p = 0.0001). Sixty-eight percent and 83% of the trials, respectively were authorized and 19% and 4% were refused and 20% and 13% were annulled, respectively (p = 0.0001). Out of the authorized protocols, 139 (69%) and 144 (50%) received approval following the introduction of modifications (p = 0.0001); of the authorized clinical trials which received clarifications, 94% and 95%, respectively were modified. Among the causes for refusal of the trial 54% and 29% were refused for considering that the trial would not provide relevant information, 58% and 71% for design aspects and 37% and 14% for inadequate patient selection. Of the authorized clinical trials 83% were controlled and randomized in both years with 76% and 73% being blind.

CONCLUSIONS

Administrative intervention positively influences in the methodologic and ethical aspects of a relevant part of the authorized clinical trials. The final quality of the clinical trial protocols appears to be comparable to the quality observed by other authors in the clinical trials published in the international literature.

摘要

背景

西班牙现行法规要求对药物临床试验进行事先审查并获得行政当局批准。这些法规促使建立了一个由卫生和福利部提交审批的临床试验数据库。通过该数据库研究了已获批准的临床试验评估过程的影响以及这些试验的最终质量。

方法

收集了1989年和1990年对应的数据,并按9个方面进行分组:对临床试验方案的澄清、进行的修改以及拒绝的原因。同样对所考虑的每个方面的质量评估以及已获批准试验的方法学特征进行了分析。

结果

1989年和1990年分别提交了298个和349个临床试验方案;1989年对72%的方案、1990年对55%的方案要求进行澄清(p = 0.0001)。分别有68%和83%的试验获得批准,19%和4%的试验被拒绝,20%和13%的试验被取消(p = 0.0001)。在已获批准的方案中,139个(69%)和144个(50%)在引入修改后获得批准(p = 0.0001);在获得澄清的已获批准临床试验中,分别有94%和95%进行了修改。在试验被拒绝的原因中,54%和29%因认为试验不会提供相关信息而被拒绝,58%和71%因设计方面原因,37%和14%因患者选择不当。在这两年中,已获批准的临床试验中有83%为对照试验且采用随机分组,其中76%和73%为盲法试验。

结论

行政干预对部分已获批准的临床试验在方法学和伦理方面产生了积极影响。临床试验方案的最终质量似乎与其他作者在国际文献中发表的临床试验所观察到的质量相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验